Skip to main content
Logo image

Section 6.7 Proof by counterexample

Sometimes we want to prove that \(P \not\lgcimplies Q\text{;}\) i.e. that \(P \lgccond Q\) is not a tautology.

Recall.

The equivalence
\begin{equation*} P \lgccond Q \lgcequiv (P \lgcand C_1 \lgccond Q) \lgcand \dotsb \lgcand (P \lgcand C_m \lgccond Q) \end{equation*}
holds for any set of cases \(C_1, C_2, \dotsc, C_m\) such that \(C_1 \lgcor \dotsb \lgcor C_m\) is a tautology. (See Section 6.4.)
So if \(P \lgcand C_i \lgccond Q\) is not a tautology for at least one \(i\text{,}\) then \(P \lgccond Q\) also cannot be a tautology. Again, this also works in the universal case since \(\forall\) distributes over \(\lgcand\) (Proposition 4.2.6).
counterexample
relative to the logical implication \(P \lgcimplies Q\text{,}\) a statement \(C\) such that \(P \lgcand C \lgccond Q\) is false

Worked Example 6.7.1.

In Exercise 6.12.8, you are asked to prove the following statement by proving the contrapositive.
If \(2^n - 1\) prime, then \(n\) is prime.
Prove that the converse of this statement is false.
Solution.
The converse statement is “If \(n\) is prime, then \(2^n - 1\) is prime.” But the case \(n=11\) is a counterexample:
\begin{equation*} 2^{11} - 1 = 2047 = 23 \cdot 89 \end{equation*}
is not prime even though \(n = 11\) is prime.

Check your understanding.