Skip to main content
Logo image

Section 5.2 Standard arguments

Subsection 5.2.1 Modus ponens

modus ponens
standard argument with form
\(p \lgccond q\)
\(p\)
\(q\)

Worked Example 5.2.1.

Verify the validity of the modus ponens standard argument.
Solution.
Verify the validity by ensuring that each row in the truth table with premises all true also has the conclusion true.
(pr) (c) (pr)
\(p\) \(q\) \(p \lgccond q\)
\(\lgctrue\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\correct\) argument is valid
\(\lgctrue\) \(\lgcfalse\) \(\lgcfalse\)
\(\lgcfalse\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\ast\)
\(\lgcfalse\) \(\lgcfalse\) \(\ast\)

Example 5.2.2.

The argument in Example 5.1.2 has modus ponens form. So it is valid, even though the first premise and the conclusion are not actually true.

Subsection 5.2.2 Modus tollens

modus tollens
standard argument with form
\(p \lgccond q\)
\(\lgcnot q\)
\(\lgcnot p\)

Worked Example 5.2.3.

Verify the validity of the modus tollens standard argument.
Solution.
Verify the validity by ensuring that each row in the truth table with premises all true also has the conclusion true.
(pr) (pr) (c)
\(p\) \(q\) \(p \lgccond q\) \(\lgcnot q\) \(\lgcnot p\)
\(\lgctrue\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\lgcfalse\) \(\ast\)
\(\lgctrue\) \(\lgcfalse\) \(\lgcfalse\) \(\ast\) \(\ast\)
\(\lgcfalse\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\lgcfalse\) \(\ast\)
\(\lgcfalse\) \(\lgcfalse\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\lgctrue\) \(\correct\) argument is valid

Example 5.2.4.

The argument in Example 5.1.1 has modus tollens form.

Subsection 5.2.3 Law of Syllogism

Law of Syllogism
standard argument with form
\(p \lgccond q\)
\(q \lgccond r\)
\(p \lgccond r\)
The Law of Syllogism may be extended to chains of conditionals of arbitrary (finite) length.
Extended Law of Syllogism
standard argument with form
\(p_1 \lgccond p_2\)
\(p_2 \lgccond p_3\)
\(\vdots \phantom{\lgccond p_n}\)
\(p_{n-1} \lgccond p_n\)
\(p_1 \lgccond p_n\)

Note 5.2.6.

We will verify that the extended Law of Syllogism is a valid argument using mathematical induction in Section 7.2.

Example 5.2.7. A syllogistic argument in English.

If I don’t study hard this term, I won’t master the course material.
If I don’t master the course material, I will fail the course.
If I fail the course, I will have to take it again next year.
If I take it again next year, I will have to study harder.
Therefore, if I don’t study hard this term, I will have to study harder next year.