Section 19.5 Maximal/minimal elements
- upper bound
- least upper bound
- an upper bound for
that is less than every other upper bound - maximum element
- lower bound
- greatest lower bound
- a lower bound for
that is greater than every other lower bound - minimum element
Fact 19.5.2.
If a subset of a partially ordered set contains a maximum element, then that maximum element is unique. And similarly for a minimum element.
Proof.
You are asked to prove this in Activity 19.5.
Example 19.5.3. Maximums, minimums, and bounds in .
- The full set
has neither a maximum nor minimum element. - The subset
has many upper bounds (anything ) and many lower bounds (anything ). However, we would refer to as the least upper bound and to as the greatest lower bound of
Example 19.5.4. Maximums, minimums, and bounds in a power set.
Suppose is a universal set, and consider partially ordered by as usual. In the full set the unique maximum element is which is just another way of saying that every element of is a subset of And the unique minimum element is which is just another way of saying that the empty set is a subset of every subset of
Now consider a subset so that is a collection of subsets of Because of the existence of maximum and minimum elements, these elements also serve as an upper and lower bound, respectively, for However, one can also find a least upper bound for by taking the union of all the subsets of contained in and one can find a greatest lower bound by taking the intersection of all the subsets of contained in
The next two definitions are stated for elements in a partially ordered set, but could also be understood for elements in a subset of a partially ordered set, as every subset of a partially ordered set is also a partially ordered set.
- maximal element
- an element for which no other element is larger
- minimal element
- an element for which no other element is smaller
Remark 19.5.5.
The difference between maximum and maximal is subtle. A maximum element must be larger than (and hence comparable to) every other element of while a maximal element must only be larger than every other element of to which it is comparable. The distinction between minimum and minimal is similar.
Test 19.5.6. Maximal/minimal elements.
Example 19.5.7. Connected components are maximal.
Let represent the collection of subgraphs of partially ordered by the subgraph relation. (By my count, ) Let represent the collection of connected subgraphs of (By my count, ) A maximal elements of would have to be a connected subgraph of that is contained in no larger connected subgraph of β but this is precisely the definition of connected component. Hence has three maximal elements, the three connected components you see in Figure 19.5.8. However, a maximum element of would be a connected subgraph of which contains every other connected subgraph of and the existence of multiple connected components in this example non-connected graph makes such a subgraph impossible.
Remark 19.5.9.
If you compare both our informal definition and formal definition of connected component with our definition of maximal element and our Test for Maximal/Minimal Elements, you should find that the definition of connected component means precisely a maximal subgraph with respect to the property of being connected.
Worked Example 19.5.10.
Let Given the Hasse diagram for on in Figure 19.5.11, determine all maximal/maximum/minimal/minimum elements, if they exist.
Solution.
The element is maximal, since each node in the Hasse diagram that is adjacent to is below it. The same reasoning confirms that and of are also maximal. However, none of them is a maximum, since none of them is larger than the other two.
The element of is a minimal element, since each node that is adjacent to it is above it. And it is the only minimal element. Furthermore, is the minimum element, since for every other node there is a walk upwards from to that node.
Warning 19.5.12.
Just drawing a node higher or lower in a Hasse diagram does not necessarily make it larger or smaller, respectively, when compared to other elements via the partial order. For example, in the Hasse diagram of Figure 19.5.11, we could have drawn the node for at a higher location, but that would not make it larger than and since there still would not have been any edges or chains of edges from downward to those other two nodes.
Fact 19.5.13.
If the partially ordered set has a maximum element, then that element is also the only maximal element of Similarly, the minimum element, if it exists, is the only minimal element of
Proof idea.
Assume has a maximum element. Then every element of is both comparable to and smaller than that maximum element, so no element is larger than it. Therefore, this maximum must be maximal. And no other element could be maximal, because to be maximal means there are no elements which are larger. But our maximum element is always larger.
Warning 19.5.14.
A maximum element must be maximal and must be the only maximal. But a maximal element, even if it is the only one, need not be the maximum.
Example 19.5.15. A partially ordered set with exactly one maximal element but no maximum element.
Consider
partially ordered by the βdividesβ relation. There is no element of that is divisible by (except itself), so there is no element of that is larger than Therefore, is maximal. Moreover, is the only maximal element in since every power of divides the next power of However, there is no maximum element in since there is no element of which is divisible by every other element of