Skip to main content
Logo image

Section 6.9 Proof by contradiction

First, sβ†’t is false precisely when s is true and t is false. On the other hand, (s∧¬t)β†’e is false precisely when s∧¬t is true, and s∧¬t is true precisely when s,Β¬t are both true, i.e. when s is true and t is false.

Worked Example 6.9.4.

Prove that 2 is irrational.
Solution.
We want to prove the quantified conditional with domain the real numbers: for all x, if x2=2 and x>0 then x is not rational.
Suppose that x is a real number such that x2=2 and x>0. By contradiction, also assume that x is rational. We want this extra assumption to lead to a false statement. Now, x rational means x=a/b for some integers a,b. We may assume a,b are both positive, since x>0. We may also assume a,b have no common factors (i.e. fraction a/b is in lowest terms). Then,
x2=2β‡’a2=2b2,β‡’a2 even,β‡’a even,β‡’a=2m, some m,β‡’2b2=a2=4m2,β‡’b2=2m2,β‡’b2 even,β‡’b even.
But if both a,b are even, then a and b are both divisible by 2. We have arrived at our contradiction: a,b have no common factor but a,b have a common factor of 2. That is, we have shown the following.
For all x, if ((x2=2 and x>0) and x not irrational) then (there exist positive integers a,b such that x=a/b and a,b have no common divisor and a,b have a common divisor).