Section 19.4 Examples
Subsection 19.4.1 Determining a basis from a parametric expression
Example 19.4.1. From the discovery guide.
First, let’s carry out some of the examples from Discovery 19.2.
-
In Discovery 19.2.c, we considered a certain subspace ofAn arbitrary vector in
requires three parameters to describe its three components: If we restrict to just those vectors whose first and third components are equal, we can replace by to getSo a basis for this subspace of is and the dimension is -
In Discovery 19.2.g, we considered a certain subspace ofAn arbitrary matrix in
requires four parameters to describe its four entries:If we restrict to those matrices whose entries sum to zero, so that then we can isolate and substitute that into the matrix:So this subspace of has dimension with basis -
In Discovery 19.2.j, we considered a certain subspace ofAn arbitrary polynomial in
requires six parameters, one for each power of along with a parameter for the constant term:If we restrict to only odd polynomials, we need to eliminate the constant term and the even powers of(Equivalently, we have applied the homogeneous conditions and ) So this subspace of has dimension with basis
Example 19.4.2. Dimensions of familiar spaces via parameters.
Now let’s examine how the dimensions of our favourite example spaces relate to our parametric point of view. We considered specific examples of these in parts of Discovery 19.2, but here we’ll work more generally.
- An arbitrary vector in
requires parameters, one for each component: Since we’ve got parameters and a corresponding standard basis vectors, we have - An arbitrary
matrix in requires parameters, one for each entry: with zeros in all entries except for a single in the entry. Since we’ve got parameters and a corresponding standard basis matrices, we have - An arbitrary polynomial in
the space of polynomials of degree or less, requires parameters, one for each power of plus an extra one for the constant term: parameters and a corresponding standard basis polynomials, we have
Example 19.4.3. The solution space of a homogeneous system.
In Remark 19.3.2, we noted how assigning parameters after row reducing a homogeneous system corresponded directly to a parameter-based procedure for determine the basis for a space. Let’s illustrate this correspondence with an example.
Consider the homogeneous system in Discovery 2.4, which we solved in Example 2.4.4. In Example 16.4.8, we used the Subspace Test to verify that the solution set of a homogeneous system with an coefficient matrix is a subspace of The system from Discovery 2.4 has a coefficient matrix that we reduced:
Assigning parameters to free variables we obtained the general solution in parametric form:
We can use these expressions as components in a general solution vector, and expand it out to a linear combination, just as in the previous examples in this subsection:
Since two parameters are needed to describe the solution vectors for this system, the solution space has dimension and a basis for this subspace is
Subsection 19.4.2 An infinite-dimensional example
All of the examples in the previous subsection involved finite-dimensional spaces. Here’s an example of an infinite-dimensional space.
In Discovery 19.3, we considered the space of all polynomials. This space cannot be spanned by any finite collection of polynomials, because such a collection would have a polynomial of largest degree, and then every linear combination of those polynomials would have that degree or smaller. So the span of those polynomials could never include polynomials of larger degree. Thus,
We can still come up with a basis for this space, but it will contain an infinite number of vectors:
This equality says that every polynomial is a linear combination of a finite number of powers of This spanning set is also linearly independent because no power of can be expressed as a linear combination of other powers of
Subsection 19.4.3 Enlarging a linearly independent set to a basis
In Discovery 19.4.b, we are given a linearly independent set of vectors in and we would like to enlarge it to a basis for the whole space. Since is linearly independent, it is a basis for the subspace Since we know that we need to add two more linearly independent vectors to get up to a basis for To do this, we can use Proposition 17.5.6, which says that to enlarge a linearly independent set, we need to add a vector from outside the span of the vectors we already have.
An obvious source for candidate vectors to use to enlarge is the standard basis We know that can’t contain all four of these vectors, because then Statement 1 of Proposition 16.5.6 would imply that all of would be contained in which is not possible because is just So let’s start by checking whether is in The vector equation
leads to a system of equations with augmented matrix as on the left below, which we can reduce:
The one in the last column indicates that the system is inconsistent, which is what we want — there is no solution, so is not in and so we can enlarge by including and it will remain linearly independent. Call the enlarged set
Now let’s check if is in the span of these three linearly independent vectors that we have already. Our vector equation is now,
which leads to a system with augmented and reduced augmented matrices
Again, there is no solution, so is not in We are now up to four linearly independent vectors, which must form a basis for the -dimensional space
A look ahead.
In the example above, we could have augmented our initial spanning set vectors with all standard basis vectors, and checked all of them all at once:
By changing the position of the vertical line that indicates the separation of the coefficients from the column of constants one column at a time, we can change our point of view on each augmented column from representing a vector to be achieved as a linear combination of the spanning vectors to a vector included as a spanning vector.