Section 2.4 The pullback of a one-form
Objectives
You should be able to:
Determine the pullback of a one-form in general.
State and use the three fundamental properties of the pullback of one-forms.
Subsection 2.4.1 The pullback of a function
Let us first define the pullback of a function in this context, generalizing Definition 2.3.3.Definition 2.4.1. The pullback of a function.
Let
Explicitely, if we write
where
Example 2.4.2. The pullback of a function from to .
To make things more concrete, let us look at a specific example. Suppose that
For instance, if
Example 2.4.3. The pullback of a function from to .
We can do the same thing but pulling back to
For instance, if
Subsection 2.4.2 An axiomatic definition of the pullback of a one-form
We will take an axiomatic approach to the definition of the pullback of a one-form. Let us first recall three important properties of one-forms (from Subsection 2.1.1 and Definition 2.2.5):If
and are one-forms on then is a one-form onIf
is a one-form on and a smooth function on then is a one-form onAn exact one-form is a one-form
that can be written as the differential of a function on
Lemma 2.4.4. The pullback of .
Let
As an example, if
The same formula for
We also note that the same result holds for the basic one-forms
Proof.
This follows from the third axiomatic property that we are imposing on the pullback. Recall from Remark 2.2.4 that we can think of
From Definition 2.4.1, we can calculate
where we use the definition of the differential of the function
Lemma 2.4.5. The pullback of a one-form.
Let
A similar formula holds if we start with a one-form on
Proof.
To prove this result, we use Lemma 2.4.4 (and the similar result for
We then use Lemma 2.4.4 to evaluate
Example 2.4.6. The pullback of a one-form from to .
Suppose that
For instance, if
Example 2.4.7. The pullback of a one-form from to .
Suppose that
For instance, if
Example 2.4.8. Consistency check: the pullback of a one-form from to .
As a consistency check, we show that the pullback of a one-from from
which indeeds reproduces Definition 2.3.4 with our notation
Exercises 2.4.3 Exercises
1.
Consider the function
First, as
We calculate its expression by composition:
2.
Consider the one-form
Let us write
We see that the pullback one-form looks the same, but written in terms of
3.
Consider the one-form
We write
The notion of pullback allows us to easily calculate how one-forms change under changes of coordinates, such as going from Cartesian to polar coordinates in this case.
4.
Consider the one-form
By definition of the pullback, we get:
5.
Let
Write
which completes the proof.
6.
Let
In other words, it doesn't matter whether we pullback in one or two steps through the chain of maps
We note here that while the exercise is only asking you to prove it for open subsets
Let us write
On the other hand, we have
and
But
by the chain rule, and hence