Council
Home Page

Trust Contract:
Appendices C-K


Trust Contract

NASA: Introduction
Table of Contents
Alphabetical Index

Memoranda
Pay Grid Appendices
Other Appendices

THE NASA OPERATING CONTRACT

Commentary:
What about This Deal?



TRUST TOPICS


WHAT'S NEW?

REP'S COUNCIL

STEWARD'S CORNER

ABOUT NASA

TRUST TOPICS

UNION COMMITTEES AND REPORTS

SOLIDARITY!

SITE INDEX

CONTACT US




 

 

Last updated: 03/15/99

 

Collective Agreement

Part B:

General Support Trust Employees

 APPENDICES C-K

 (Pay Grid Appendices A-B)

 

Ratification Date to March 31, 2000

 


Appendix C Letter of Intent - Pay Periods

Appendix D Article 27A - Dispute Resolution Process - Interim Procedure

Appendix E Letter of Intent - Physical Education and Recreation

Appendix F Job Families

Appendix G NASA Representative Waiver

Appendix H Roster of Arbitrators

Appendix I Exclusions/Inclusions Definition Guidelines

Appendix J Exclusions/Inclusions Roster

Appendix K University of Alberta Disciplinary Policy
(for information purposes only) 


Appendix C
Letter of Intent – Pay Periods

 

January 30, 1999

 

Non-Academic Staff Association
8303 - 112 Street
7-50 University Extension Centre

 

This is to confirm that the Governors of the University of Alberta will ensure to the best of its ability, to pay employees on the following basis:

  • Employees paid on a monthly basis shall receive their salary cheques on the second last banking day of each month except in December when it shall be the second last banking day prior to December 25th.
  • Employees paid on a bi-monthly payroll shall receive their paycheques on the 10th and 25th days of each month. The Governors of the University of Alberta reserve the right to amend the bi-monthly pay period to a bi-weekly pay period upon implementation of Peoplesoft. New pay dates as a result of this amendment will, as a minimum, comply with the Employment Standards Code.
  • Premium pay, other than Overtime, shall be paid no later than the month following the month in which it was earned.

 

___________________________

Bruce L Anderson

Director, Employee Relations and Employment Services
On Behalf of the Governors of the University of Alberta


Appendix D

Memorandum of Agreement

between

the Governors of the University of Alberta

(herein after called the "University")

and

the Non-Academic Staff Association

(herein after called "NASA")

 

Further to this Agreement, the parties are discussing the outstanding issue of an appropriate process for resolving discrimination and harassment complaints by or affecting NASA members. In addition, NASA and the University agree that it is in the best interest of all University Employees to hold these discussions with representatives of the Academic Staff Association of the University of Alberta (herein after called "AAS:UA").

Subsequent to the above discussions, NASA and the University agree to either formally develop a new process for effectively dealing with these issues or submit this Interim Procedure as a proposal for the next negotiations.

Both parties agree that during use of this interim procedure, the current Sexual Harassment: Article 27 provisions are suspended.

Both parties agree to the following interim procedure:

Interim Procedure - Article 27A Dispute Resolution Process

Discrimination and Harassment Complaints

1. In matters alleging discrimination and harassment, the University of Alberta Policy on Discrimination and Harassment as at January 1998 (i.e., GFC Manual Section 44) will apply.

2. An Employee who believes that s/he has a problem is encouraged to first inform the individual with the offending conduct of the concern and seek to work out a plan for the behaviour to cease and to establish an effective working environment. The individuals are encouraged to seek a facilitator to assist where possible. If no agreement is reached, or the behaviour continues, or it is impractical for the individuals to deal informally with the matter, the Employee may make a complaint under the Policy on Discrimination and Harassment.

3. Failing satisfactory resolution through the Policy’s guidelines (i.e., Informal Resolution Procedure - GFC Section 44.7), NASA may initiate a grievance at Step 2 (Clause 26.02(c)) of the Dispute Resolution Process.

4. A grievance received at Step 2 of the Dispute Resolution Process shall be dealt with confidentially. Information relating to the complaint, including the identity of the individuals involved, will be disclosed only to the extent necessary to properly investigate the complaint and to respond to legal or administrative proceedings.

5. The University agrees that any Employee has the right to representation by NASA.

6. The AVP (HRS) or designee having received the grievance shall investigate the matter or the AVP (HRS) may appoint an independent investigator to investigate the matter and report on his/her findings and conclusions. The AVP(HRS) shall attempt to ensure a timely, complete and fair investigation. NASA shall be entitled to a copy of the investigator’s report.

7. The parties endeavour to ensure that no person shall intentionally compromise the integrity of the investigation process.

8. Where there is a grievance, the grievor may request to the AVP(HRS) that his/her employment duties be modified, as the nature of the particular circumstances dictate, in an attempt to eliminate contact with the respondent during the period of investigation. Such request shall not be unreasonably denied.

9. Prior to making any final determination in this matter (i.e., Step II grievance decision), the AVP(HRS), or designee, shall meet with the grievor and designated official of NASA to review the investigator’s report. The Director, Employee Relations & Employment Services may be invited to participate in any such meetings.

10. Upon review of the investigation report and such other consideration as may be relevant, the AVP (HRS) may:

(a) dismiss the complaint/grievance;

(b) direct the investigator to investigate further; or

(c) recommend to the Employee’s Trustholder or designee that the results of the investigation require remedy.

11. The AVP(HRS) or designee, shall make a written decision in this matter with copies to the grievor, NASA and any other affected party.

12. Failing satisfactory resolution of the grievance, NASA after full discussion with the Employee, may submit the grievance to Step 3 (Clause 26.02(d)) of the Dispute Resolution Process within ten (10) days of the receipt of the written response from the AVP(HRS), or designee.

13. Process and resolution of the grievance shall follow Article 26 of this Agreement. Both parties agree that the nature of these types of complaints/grievances may require additional time to fully investigate and review; therefore, both parties acknowledge that time limits within the Dispute Resolution Process may need to be extended.

14. The University agrees that no grievor or person who participates as a witnesses in the investigation and/or grievance shall suffer any reprisals by virtue only of their participation in the proceedings. However, NASA and the University also recognize the serious nature of unfounded allegations of discrimination and harassment and agree that disciplinary action may be required in those cases that the accusations are shown to be fraudulent and/or malicious.

15. If the AVP(HRS) makes a decision pursuant to 26(c) above, the AVP(HRS) shall send the recommendation to the Trustholder and the Trustholder shall take appropriate remedial action.

16. If the AVP(HRS) determines that there are sufficient grounds to recommend disciplinary action against a NASA member, the AVP(HRS) shall make such a recommendation to that respondent’s respective Trustholder and the Trustholder shall undertake appropriate disciplinary action.

17. If the AVP(HRS) determines that there is sufficient grounds to initiate a complaint against an AAS:UA member, the AVP(HRS) shall submit a formal complaint under Article 16 of the AAS:UA Agreement.

18. Where applicable or necessary, counselling for affected persons in the particular workplace shall be provided.

19. NASA and the University agree that NASA members may choose to submit a complaint under Article 16 of the AAS:UA Agreement; however, an employee or NASA shall not concurrently submit the same complaint as a grievance or grievance as a complaint.

 

SIGNED this _______ day of __________________ 1999, in Edmonton, Alberta.

 

On behalf of the On Behalf of the Governors

Non-Academic Staff Association of the University of Alberta

 


Appendix E
Letter of Intent – Physical Education and Recreation

 

January 30, 1999

 

Non-Academic Staff Association
7-50 University Extension Centre
8303 - 112 Street
Edmonton, Alberta
T6G 1K4

 

Re: Physical Education and Recreation

The Governors of the University of Alberta agrees to provide all employees and their immediate family full access to physical education and recreation facilities on Campus.

 

Bruce L. Anderson

Director, Employee Relations and Employment Services
University of Alberta

 


Appendix F
JOB FAMILY GROUPINGS

 

I Business/Administrative/Finance/Clerical

Descriptors:

  • Occupations not normally industry specific
  • Provides administrative expertise/support services of a non-technical nature to operational/programmatic unit
  • Administrative infrastructure for an operational unit

II Technical/Information Systems

Descriptors:

  • Occupational/discipline specific
  • Normally requires formal training within occupation/discipline
  • Provides technical expertise and support services in specific discipline
  • Certain occupations require professional designation

III Transport/Maintenance/Utilities/Trades

Descriptors:

  • Provides physical infrastructure support
  • Normally requires certificate/designation

IV Health (Medical/Dental/Pharmacy)

Descriptors:

  • Provides medical support and services in the related medical fields to operational units, patients/clients
  • Requires formal post-secondary training within respective health services/disciplines (legally required professional designations)

Appendix G
NASA Representative Waiver

 

DATE: ______________

 

I, ____________________________, __________________________________

(print name)                                  (signature)

have been advised that Non-Academic Staff Association (NASA) representation is available to assist me with this meeting, however, I have chosen to deny such representation in favour of proceeding on my own accord. I am aware of the time limits under the Board/NASA collective agreement that must be followed to file a grievance.

 

___________________________ _________________

Witness Date

 

cc: Copy to Employee

Copy to Employee Relations

 


Appendix H
Roster of Agreed to Mediators/Arbitrators

 

The Non Academic Staff Association and the Governors of the University of Alberta hereby agree to the following roster of Mediators/Arbitrators as identified in Article 26:

Sue Bercov*
David Elliot
Elizabeth Johnson*

David Jones
Shelley Miller*

Allen Ponak
Andrew Sims
David Tettensor

* The parties agree that the noted individual(s) shall be placed on the roster list on a trial basis subject to the continuing agreement of either party.

 

 

Signed this ___________ of _________________, 1999, at Edmonton, Alberta.

 

On behalf of On behalf of the Governors

the Non-Academic Staff Association of the University of Alberta


Appendix I
Exclusions/Inclusions Definitions: Guidelines

The following definitions are guidelines to be used to assist in determining the exclusion or inclusion of a position/person from this Agreement pursuant to Article 2:

 

1. General Support Trust Staff (included)

(a) Description:

- comprises staff who work in support of University operations falling within the following applicable job families:

- Business/Administrative/Finance/Clerical

- Technical/Information Systems

- Transport/Maintenance/Utilities/Trades

- Health (Medical/Dental/Pharmacy)

(b) General Duties:

- functions in a support role with appropriate duties

(c) Qualifications/Experience:

- will vary and are appropriate to the job duties/functions

2. Post Doctoral Fellows (PDFs) (excluded)

(a) Description:

- PDFs are post-graduate students receiving independent research training and are paid an applicable stipend from funds provided by a research granting agency or contractor; movement into a tenure track position or a senior research associate position is a natural transition following completion of the PDF training

(b) General Duties:

- duties are varied as directed by the trustholder and will typically involve research training and assistance on specific research projects directly related to post graduate qualifications

(c) Qualifications/Experience:

- holds a Ph.D. or equivalent;

- typically no greater than 5 years of post-doctoral research training at a post-secondary institution

3. Graduate/Undergraduate Students Paid from Trust (excluded)

(a) Description:

- individuals registered as graduate or undergraduate students involved in research work directly or indirectly related to the course of studies for which they are enrolled as a student; such positions are viewed as an apprenticeship for further academic or professional careers

(b) General Duties:

- duties are varied as directed by the trustholder and will typically involve research training and assistance on specific research projects directly related to their academic qualifications

(c) Qualifications/Experience:

- undergraduate degree/enrollment in undergraduate program or equivalent related to the area in which they are training/performing work

4. Research Associate (excluded)

(a) Description:

- individuals who are employed in high level research activities who hold the same academic qualifications as faculty members in the same discipline and have the potential opportunity to move into tenure track positions at a post secondary educational institution

(b) General Duties:

- the research associate carries out high level complex research projects either as primary or co-investigator under the direction of the trustholder;

- sets research objectives;

- independently, or at the direction of the trustholder, develops experiments, research methods and protocol;

- designs and develops instrumentation and equipment for research projects;

- co-authors or independently publishes research results and participates in analysis and presentation of research results

(c) Qualifications/Experience:

- normally equivalent to faculty members within the same department/faculty;

- will normally have prior original research experience;

- for example:

- Faculty of Medicine

- a Ph.D., M.D., or equivalent to their area of research

- will normally have prior post-doctoral/residency experience

- Faculty of Law

- minimum requirement of a L.L.B. usually with one or more undergraduate degrees

5. Research Trust Manager (excluded)

(a) Description:

- individuals appointed to senior management positions, ones which are similar to APOs in the Operating accounts

(b) General Duties:

- duties will vary with the particular position but, in general, these will be managerial, executive or supervisory in nature, with significant decision-making requirement. Duties will not be clerical or routine;

- duties will involve intermediate and long-range planning

- the incumbents will carry out their responsibilities with little or no supervision;

- responsible for selection, supervision and evaluation of clerical and technical staff;

- responsible for budgeting and financial control of operation;

(c) Qualifications/Experience:

- academic degree, professional qualifications and related experience in managerial positions;

- useful to have knowledge of the discipline associated with the trust/research grant as well as management skills

 


Appendix J
Exclusions/Inclusions Roster

The Non Academic Staff Association and the Governors of the University of Alberta hereby agree to the following roster of adjudicators as provided for in Article 2:

 

 

Signed this ___________ of _________________, 1999, at Edmonton, Alberta.

 

On behalf of On behalf of the Governors

the Non-Academic Staff Association of the University of Alberta

 


 

Appendix K
University of Alberta Disciplinary Process

(This Process applies to Employees covered by the Non-Academic Staff Association but it is not part of this Agreement, and is included for information purposes only.)

A) Definition of Discipline

In the administration of discipline, the University, through its Trustholders, uses a corrective behaviour approach of the progressive disciplinary model (e.g., verbal reprimand, written reprimand, increment withholding, suspension, demotion and dismissal). This does not preclude the Trustholder or designee from analyzing the circumstances and facts of each case and omitting certain steps in the model, taking a non-sequential level of disciplinary action or other type of action as deemed appropriate, upon the advice of Employee Relations.

The key element in disciplinary action is that of warning; advising that the circumstance(s) is/are serious enough to require disciplinary action. Disciplinary actions can include the element of forewarning in that a more serious disciplinary penalty may be used in the future if such action is repeated or certain related matters occur or reoccur. The situation(s) requiring a disciplinary penalty is/are serious in that it/they cannot be tolerated or condoned.

The following do not constitute disciplinary actions:

(1) letters of concern regarding innocent absenteeism or performance expectations;

(2) constructive criticism as part of an annual performance appraisal process;

(3) job or work related instructions;

(4) relief of duty with pay pending review or investigation; or

(5) ongoing coaching - counseling discussions (including training).

The emphasis in dealing with performance problems is through the use of ongoing coaching and counselling. This approach recognizes that early intervention can help overcome problems and weaknesses. This is not disciplinary in nature. Increment withholding is appropriate in instances of marginal or unsatisfactory performance, incompetence or unsuitability. It is the intent of the University, through its Trustholders, to use a written reprimand as the disciplinary document in instances of increment withholdings. Performance appraisals, counselling letters/reports, etc. may be used as support documents for the above.

It is recognized that the Agreement allows Employees to rebut to the criticism in the performance appraisal. As such, a performance appraisal is not disciplinary. Further, the performance appraisal interview is a process designed for the participation of the Employee and supervisor only.

 B) The Right to NASA Representation

The University recognizes an Employee's right to NASA representation in the following meetings regarding discipline with the Employee:

(1) formal investigation interviews into matters/conduct that the University believes may ultimately lead to disciplinary action; or

(2) a meeting convened for a disciplinary purpose.

When a Trustholder conducts a formal investigation interview, which may ultimately lead to discipline, the Employee shall be advised of his/her ability to have NASA representation at any such meeting. The Employee may waive representation.

When an Employee is to be disciplined to the extent of formal disciplinary action (written reprimand, increment withholding, suspension, demotion or dismissal), such discipline shall only be imposed at a meeting convened for that purpose. A supervisor requiring an Employee to attend any such disciplinary meeting shall advise the Employee of their ability to be accompanied by a recognized NASA representative. The Employee may waive representation.

C) Representation by NASA

The role of a NASA representative during these meetings is to:

(1) observe the process and witness the undertakings,

(2) advise the Employee of any rights during the process, and

(3) assist the Employee, without interfering or impeding the disciplinary process, in discussing the issues involved.

No person who participates during the disciplinary process shall be subject to any reprisals.

NASA has undertaken that representatives and Employees will attend any such requested meeting in an agreed and timely fashion.

D) Responsibility of the Employee

The responsibility of the Employee is to attend and to respond directly to questions posed to them by the Trustholder or designee during any meetings covered by this process. Failure to attend a meeting or respond directly to questions posed may result in subsequent disciplinary action.

E) Authority to Take Disciplinary Action

At the University, all disciplinary action shall be taken under the authority of the Trustholder or designee. In disciplinary matters, including but not limited to written reprimands, increment withholding, suspension, demotion or dismissal, the Trustholder or designee shall consult with Employee Relations prior to taking any disciplinary action.

F) Responsibility of Campus Security, Audit and other investigative units/departments

Campus Security, Audit and any other department/unit charged with the responsibility of investigating some incident that may ultimately lead to disciplining an Employee, will inform Employee Relations when it becomes apparent that an Employee will be potentially affected by any disciplinary action.

 


Back to Main Contract

 

 Council Home Page  Back to the Top