Having developed the nonrelativistic propagator, we now turn to the development of the relativistic propagators. To delay the slight complication introduced by the Dirac matrices, we first develop the Klein-Gordon propagator. We will only consider the free-particle Klein-Gordon propagator in this section.

The free-particle Klein-Gordon propagator, , is defined to satisfy the Green's function equation

The minus sign on the right-hand side of equation 6.45 is choosen by convention since equation 4.69 also has a minus sign on the right-hand side. In addition to satisfying equation 6.45, the propagator must also only propagate positive-energy solutions forward in time and only propagate negative-energy solutions backward in time.

Rather than solve the Green's function equation in configuration space, we work in momentum space. The momentum-space representation will be totally adequate for our purposes since we will never require the explicit form of the propagators in configuration space.

The Fourier transform of the momentum-space propagator, , into configuration space is

(6.46) |

Substituting this Fourier transform into equation 6.45, performing the differentiations, and representing the delta function as a Fourier transform gives

(6.47) |

Therefore

(6.48) | |||

(6.49) |

provided . There is a singularity at . Or in other words, when . This means that the particle represented by the Green's function is off mass-shell, and and are independent variables. The origin of negative-energy waves in relativistic theories is the pole at , which was not present in the nonrelativistic theory.

A prescription for how to handle the singularities is need to complete the definition of the propagator. The interpretation given to the Green function is that it represents the wave produced at the point by a unit source located at . A necessary physical requirement is that the wave propagating from into the future consist only of positive-energy components. The boundary conditions on the integration of provide this requirement.

One can evaluate by Cauchy integration in the -plane. We perform the integration along the contour in the complex -plane, which is infinitesimal close to the real axis and avoids the poles at in some way. As shown in figure 6.5, we close the contour with a semi-circle at infinity: above for and below for . Only the positive pole contributes for and only the negative pole contributes for . After the contour integration has been performed, one must take the limit as the contour approaches the real axis and the enclosed semi-circle approaches infinity along the imaginary axis.

For , the contour is closed in the lower half-plane and includes the positive-energy pole at only. The factor in the integrand will vanish as , if . Performing the integral in this case, we have

(6.50) |

Using Cauchy's integral formula for the pole at gives

where the minus sign comes from the clockwise direction of the contour enclosing the pole.

For , the contour is close in the upper half-plane and includes the negative-energy pole at . The factor in the integrand will vanish as , if . Performing the integral in this case, we have

Notice that the only difference between the result of the two integrations is the sign of in the exponential.

We point out that any other choice of the integration contour, for example those shown in figure 6.6, would lead to contributions from negative-energy waves propagating into the future (figure 6.6a) or positive-energy waves propagating into the past (figure 6.6b).

An equivalent procedure for performing the integration along the real axis is to displace the poles slightly away from the axis by a small real number :

(6.53) | |||

This procedure is shown in figure 6.7. After the integration one takes the limit as the poles approach the real axis ( ).

The procedure of displacing the poles from the real axis is equivalent to adding a small positive imaginary part to the denominator of the propagator and is to be taken at the end of the calculation:

(6.54) |

Then the singularity corresponding to positive-energy states is

(6.55) |

which lies below the real -axis, while the pole corresponding to negative-energy states is

(6.56) |

which is located above the -axis, as required. is another small positive real number.

This prescription is most easily remembered in the form of a rule: to ensure the correct boundary conditions, the mass has to be given a small negative imaginary part ( ). Writing it this way, we have

(6.57) | |||

where .

Returning back now to our two solutions (equations 6.51 and 6.52) we can combine them into one form by using step functions, , to give

(6.58) |

Using the normalized plane-wave solutions (equation 4.21), we can write

(6.59) |

The progagator now consists of a term (first term) propagating positive-energy solutions and another term (second term) propagating negative-energy solutions. The step functions ensure that the positive-energy solutions are propagated forward in time and the negative-energy solutions backward in time.

When propagating waves in the Klein-Gordon theory, the operator is sandwiched between the propagator and the wave function to allow the orthogonality and normalization conditions (equations 4.58 and 4.59, respectively) to be used.

Consider a general wave,

(6.60) |

consisting of positive- and negative-energy components. Propagating the positive-energy component gives

(6.61) |

Using the orthonormal relationships (equations 4.58 and 4.59) give

Similar for the negative-energy component,

Thus propagates only the positive-energy part of a general wave function forward in time and the negative-energy part backward in time, as required. The occurrence of a relative minus sign between equations 6.62 and 6.63 results from the difference in the direction of propagation in time.

2004-03-18