On this page you can download the ClimateAF software and approximately 3,000 climate grids at 30 arcsec (~1 km) and 2.5 arcmin (5 km) resolution for historical climate (1901-2020) in monthly, annual, decadal, and 30-year steps and projected future climate (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) based on CMIP6 multi-model projections.
The database includes monthly base variables (Tmin, Tmax, Tave & Prec) as well as economically or biologically relevant (bioclim) variables such as growing and chilling degree days, heating and cooling degree days, Hargrave's climate moisture deficit and reference evaporation, and seasonal variables.
The climate grids were developed with a deep neural network that uses geographic and atmospheric information to model local weather patterns at medium resolution (e.g. see examples below, with the inset showing precipitation induced by orographic lift on the windward side, and rain shadows on the leeward side of major mountain ranges: Rift Valley, Mt Kenya, Mt Kilimanjaro area).
Subsequently, the ClimateAF software downscales the grids to higher resolutions with a digital elevation model in conjunction with local environmental lapse-rates. The software can also provide scale-free point estimates of climate variables for user-provided latitude, longitude and elevation coordinates.
Data downloads at 30 arcsec (~1 km) and 2.5 arcmin (5 km) resolution are available from the tables below, but you may also visually explore some sample grids: click on a thumbnails below and then zoom in or out of different areas ( ), or view the RGB-GeoTIFFs in GIS.
Mean Annual Precipitation (View, GIS) | Mean Coldest Month Temp (View, GIS) | Precipitation Dec-Jan-Feb (View, GIS) | Climate Moisture Deficit (View, GIS) |
Mean Annual Temperature (View, GIS) | Mean Warmest Month Temp (View, GIS) | Avg Min Temp Dec-Jan-Feb (View, GIS) | Reference Elevation Grid (View, GIS) |
This program does not require installation. Download, unzip, and double click the executable file ClimateAF.exe. The program should run on all versions of Windows. If you receive the error message "COMCTL32.OCX missing", you have to install these libraryfiles. The program also runs on Linux, Unix and Mac systems with the free software Wine or MacPorts/Wine).
Poster describing the methodology for the underlying climate interpolations.
Video tutorials on how to use the software to obtain climate data for sample locations, or to produce climate grids for a study area.
This dataset was created with the ClimateAF v1.10 software package for historical and projected 30-year normal periods. To generate additional projections for individual GCMs, you can use the "ClimateAF input file" with the "Grid generator R code", included in the "Readme" file below. The download packages of historical and projected climate data contain geoTIFF files compatible with most GIS applications in the standard WGS84 geographic (= EPSG:4326) projection. See the "Readme" file for further details and explanations:
Help file |
ClimateAF input file |
Elevation, ID reference |
Area covered |
---|---|---|---|
Usage, variables, grid generator: | 2.5 arcmin CSV: | 2.5 arcmin geoTIFF: | Shapefile: |
Help file |
ClimateAF input file |
Elevation, ID reference |
Area covered |
---|---|---|---|
Usage, variables, grid generator: | 30 arcsec CSV: | 30 arcsec geoTIFF: | Shapefile: |
If you want to quantify uncertainty in future projections, you need to work with a selection of multiple, individual models. This is easily done with the provided software for locations of interest (see video tutorial), the pre-selected grids downloadable below, or it is also fairly straight-forward to generate custom grids with the help of some R code (included in the help file) if your data needs are different.
To help with the selection of a representative set of models for different regions of Africa (or for the entire continent), we used the Katsavounidis-Kuo-Zhang (KKZ) algorithm which selects an optimally representative set of future projections for different IPCC climate reference regions considering multiple climate variables (click on left panel dendrogram to visualize similarity among models):
A common approach is to select a median, a pessimistic and an optimistic projection, i.e., a subset size of 3. For example, to assess uncertainty in West Africa (WAF) with a 3-model ensemble, you would choose the models: GISS (median), MPI (optimistic), and EC (pessimistic) from the table below (compare with the dendrogram above). Adding models (rows 4 to 8) will provide increasingly better representation of uncertainty in future predictions in multivariate space.
To include the sensitive "outlier" model UKES in the model selection process, use the lower portion of the table. If UKES is included, this scenario will almost always be picked second, as the most "pessimistic" model of global warming. UKES is not a very likely outcome, but if you work with a larger ensemble, you may include it as one possible outcome. For details on GCM selection process, see Mahoney et al. (2022)
Subset size |
IPCC climate reference region |
Africa |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARP |
CAF |
ESAF |
MDG |
MED |
NEAF |
SAH |
SEAF |
WAF |
WCA |
WSAF |
||
Excluding UKESM1-0-LL | ||||||||||||
1 | GISS | MRI | GFDL | MRI | CNRM | GISS | CNRM | GFDL | GISS | MRI | GFDL | GISS |
2 | EC | MPI | CNRM | ACC | EC | MIR | MPI | ACC | MPI | EC | CNRM | MPI |
3 | MRI | ACC | MPI | MIR | MPI | ACC | EC | MIR | EC | MPI | MIR | ACC |
4 | MPI | MIR | MIR | CNRM | GISS | GFDL | MRI | MPI | ACC | MIR | GISS | MIR |
5 | ACC | EC | GISS | GISS | MRI | MRI | ACC | EC | MIR | ACC | EC | MRI |
6 | CNRM | GFDL | EC | MPI | ACC | EC | GISS | MRI | CNRM | GFDL | MPI | EC |
7 | GFDL | CNRM | ACC | EC | MIR | MPI | MIR | CNRM | GFDL | CNRM | MRI | CNRM |
8 | MIR | GISS | MRI | GFDL | GFDL | CNRM | GFDL | GISS | MRI | GISS | ACC | GFDL |
Including UKESM1-0-LL | ||||||||||||
1 | CNRM | GISS | EC | CNRM | CNRM | GISS | CNRM | CNRM | CNRM | CNRM | EC | CNRM |
2 | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | MPI | UKES | UKES | UKES |
3 | EC | MPI | MPI | MPI | EC | MIR | MPI | MPI | UKES | EC | MIR | MPI |
4 | MPI | EC | MIR | MIR | MPI | ACC | EC | MIR | EC | MPI | CNRM | GFDL |
5 | MRI | MIR | CNRM | GISS | GISS | GFDL | MRI | EC | GFDL | GFDL | GISS | ACC |
6 | ACC | ACC | GISS | ACC | MRI | MRI | ACC | GISS | MIR | MIR | MRI | EC |
7 | GISS | GFDL | MRI | MRI | ACC | EC | GISS | MRI | GISS | ACC | GFDL | MIR |
8 | MIR | CNRM | ACC | EC | MIR | MPI | MIR | GFDL | ACC | MRI | MPI | GISS |
9 | GFDL | MRI | GFDL | GFDL | GFDL | CNRM | GFDL | ACC | MRI | GISS | ACC | MRI |
Below, you can find a table with individual scenario downloads for uncertainty analysis. This is not the full set of SSPs at high resolution, as this is not typically necessary for a meaningful uncertainty analysis. The selection below will be suitable to quantify medium term (2050s) and long term (2080s) uncertainty in projections, as well as the dependence of outcomes on two SSPs.
Note that the ClimateAF package has not undergone peer-review in a journal yet. In the interim, reference usage like this: "Climate data has been generated with the ClimateAF v1.10 softwarepackage, available at http://tinyurl.com/ClimateAF, based on methodology similar to Mahoney et al. (2022) and Wang et al. (2016)."