On this page you can download the ClimateEU software and approximately 3,000 climate grids at 1 km resolution for historical climate (1901-2020) in monthly, annual, decadal, and 30-year steps and projected future climate (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) based on CMIP6 multi-model projections.
The database includes monthly base variables (Tmin, Tmax, Tave & Prec) as well as economically or biologically relevant (bioclim) variables such as growing and chilling degree days, beginning and end of frost free period, heating and cooling degree days, Hargrave's climate moisture deficit and reference evaporation, precipitation as snow, and seasonal variables.
The climate grids were developed with a deep neural network that uses geographic and atmospheric information to model local weather patterns. Click on image on the right ( ) to see a higher resolution version, with the inset showing precipitation induced by orographic lift and rain shadows in the Alps region.
Subsequently, the ClimateEU software downscales the grids to higher resolutions with a digital elevation model in conjunction with local environmental lapse-rates. The software can also provide scale-free point estimates of climate variables for user-provided latitude, longitude and elevation coordinates.
A manuscript for a new deep-learning based ClimateEU software package including CMIP6 future projections [ClimateEU v5] is in preparation. In the meantime, you can cite our previous publication for use of the older CMIP5 dataset:
Get started with these two video-tutorials. This first video explains the basic functionality of the software (1) interactive query of climate for locations, (2) processing spreadsheets of locations, (3) generating time series of climate, and (4) basic processing of gridded data. The second video explains in detail how to generate continental scale climate grids in projected coordinate systems, and how to automate generation of multiple climate surfaces for a variety of climate variables, historical time periods and future projections.
This software can be used to query climate variables for any location, elevation and time period across Europe. The program does not require installation. Download, unzip, and double click the executable file ClimateEU.exe. The program should run on all versions of Windows. If you receive the error message "COMCTL32.OCX missing", you have to install these libraryfiles. The program also runs on Linux, Unix and Mac systems with the free software Wine or MacPorts/Wine).
[currently under development - check back in February] Meanwhile you can use our CMIP5 dataset available here.
Help file |
ClimateEU input file |
Elevation, ID reference |
Area covered |
---|---|---|---|
Usage, variables, grid generator: | 2.5 arcmin CSV: | 2.5 arcmin geoTIFF: | Shapefile: |
[currently under development - check back in February] Meanwhile you can use our CMIP5 dataset available here.
Help file |
ClimateEU input file |
Elevation, ID reference |
Area covered |
---|---|---|---|
Usage, variables, grid generator: | 30 arcsec CSV: | 30 arcsec geoTIFF: | Shapefile: |
[currently under development - check back in February] Meanwhile you can use our CMIP5 dataset available here.
If you want to quantify uncertainty in future projections, you need to work with a selection of multiple, individual models. This is easily done with the provided software for locations of interest (see video tutorial above), the pre-selected grids downloadable below, or it is also fairly straight-forward to generate custom grids with the help of some R code (included in the help file) if your data needs are different.
To help with the selection of a representative set of models for different regions of Africa (or for the entire continent), we used the Katsavounidis-Kuo-Zhang (KKZ) algorithm which selects an optimally representative set of future projections for different IPCC climate reference regions considering multiple climate variables:
A common approach is to select a median, a pessimistic and an optimistic projection, i.e., a subset size of 3. For example, to assess uncertainty in the alps region, including Swtzerland and Austria (ch/at) with a 3-model ensemble, you would choose the models: GISS (median), MPI (optimistic), and EC (pessimistic) from the table below. Adding models (rows 4 to 8) will provide increasingly better representation of uncertainty in future predictions in multivariate space.
To include the sensitive "outlier" model UKES in the model selection process, use the lower portion of the table. If UKES is included, this scenario will almost always be picked second, as the most "pessimistic" model of global warming. UKES is not a very likely outcome, but if you work with a larger ensemble, you may include it as one possible outcome. For details on GCM selection process, see Mahoney et al. (2022)
Subset size |
IPCC climate reference region (upper case) / groups of countries (lower case) |
Europe |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEU |
WCE |
MED |
uk/ie |
pt/es |
fr/bl/lu |
nl/dk/de |
no/se/fi |
ch/at |
eu-ne |
eu-se |
||
Excluding UKESM1-0-LL | ||||||||||||
1 | GISS | MRI | GFDL | MRI | CNRM | GISS | CNRM | GFDL | GISS | MRI | GFDL | GISS |
2 | EC | MPI | CNRM | ACC | EC | MIR | MPI | ACC | MPI | EC | CNRM | MPI |
3 | MRI | ACC | MPI | MIR | MPI | ACC | EC | MIR | EC | MPI | MIR | ACC |
4 | MPI | MIR | MIR | CNRM | GISS | GFDL | MRI | MPI | ACC | MIR | GISS | MIR |
5 | ACC | EC | GISS | GISS | MRI | MRI | ACC | EC | MIR | ACC | EC | MRI |
6 | CNRM | GFDL | EC | MPI | ACC | EC | GISS | MRI | CNRM | GFDL | MPI | EC |
7 | GFDL | CNRM | ACC | EC | MIR | MPI | MIR | CNRM | GFDL | CNRM | MRI | CNRM |
8 | MIR | GISS | MRI | GFDL | GFDL | CNRM | GFDL | GISS | MRI | GISS | ACC | GFDL |
Including UKESM1-0-LL | ||||||||||||
1 | CNRM | GISS | EC | CNRM | CNRM | GISS | CNRM | CNRM | CNRM | CNRM | EC | CNRM |
2 | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | UKES | MPI | UKES | UKES | UKES |
3 | EC | MPI | MPI | MPI | EC | MIR | MPI | MPI | UKES | EC | MIR | MPI |
4 | MPI | EC | MIR | MIR | MPI | ACC | EC | MIR | EC | MPI | CNRM | GFDL |
5 | MRI | MIR | CNRM | GISS | GISS | GFDL | MRI | EC | GFDL | GFDL | GISS | ACC |
6 | ACC | ACC | GISS | ACC | MRI | MRI | ACC | GISS | MIR | MIR | MRI | EC |
7 | GISS | GFDL | MRI | MRI | ACC | EC | GISS | MRI | GISS | ACC | GFDL | MIR |
8 | MIR | CNRM | ACC | EC | MIR | MPI | MIR | GFDL | ACC | MRI | MPI | GISS |
9 | GFDL | MRI | GFDL | GFDL | GFDL | CNRM | GFDL | ACC | MRI | GISS | ACC | MRI |
Below, you can find a table with individual scenario downloads for uncertainty analysis. This is not the full set of SSPs is not typically necessary for a meaningful uncertainty analysis. The selection below will be suitable to quantify medium term (2050s) and long term (2080s) uncertainty in projections, as well as the dependence of outcomes on two SSPs.
[currently under development - check back in February] Meanwhile you can use our CMIP5 dataset available here.
This research has, in part, been sponsored by the Alexander von Humboldt foundation and an NSERC Discovery Grant.