We now consider the scattering of positrons in a Coulomb field. We expect the form to be similar to the Coulomb scattering of an electron.
The -matrix for the process in figure 7.3 is
![]() |
(7.80) |
Here the incoming state is in the future and is to be interpreted as a
negative-energy electron of four-momentum running backward in
time.
Putting in plane waves to lowest order, the wave function is
![]() |
(7.81) |
Similarly, the outgoing state is the negative-energy electron running backward into the past. Its wave function is
![]() |
(7.82) |
representing the incident positron with momentum and
polarization
before the scattering.
The
-matrix becomes (cf equation 7.30)
![]() |
(7.83) |
By the same calculation as in equation 7.45, we find the differential cross-section is
![]() |
(7.84) |
Again the spin sum may be reduced to a trace, using the relation for positron spinors
![]() |
(7.85) |
The first minus sign comes from the normalization of the negative-energy spinors and the relative minus sign of the two terms comes from the negative-energy projection operator.
The differential cross-section now becomes
![]() |
(7.86) |
This is the same as the result of equation 7.50 for the electron
with replaced by
.
Since our answer for electron scattering was even in
, this
shows that the positron scattering cross-section is equal to the
electron scattering cross-section in lowest order of
.
We could have anticipated this result from charge conjugation invariance. We could equally well write
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
(7.87) |
which leads to the same results as before.
In this picture the positron runs forward in time and
is the wave function of the initial positron.
Previously we saw that for each solution of the electron in the
potential there is a corresponding solution of the positron in
the potential
, that is, the scattering of an electron from
the potential
is the same as that of a positron from
potential
; however, since the calculated cross-section
depends only on
, the sign of
does not matter.
This is not true for the
correction which comes from the product
of the first- and second-order scattering amplitudes, which have
opposite signs for electrons and positrons.
We may also observe that the positron cross-section is obtained from
that of the electron by replacing
; this is a
general feature of positron theory called the ``substitution rule'',
which is closely related to the propagator picture we have developed.