We first consider the nonrelativistic case and then the relativistic
case.
In order to define properly the scattering problem, there should be
no interaction at the initial time, so that is a solution of
the free-particle equation which incorporates the required initial
conditions.
![]() |
(6.85) |
The exact wave
becomes the incoming wave
in the limit
:
![]() |
(6.86) |
We are primarily interested in the form of the scattering wave as
.
In this limit the particle emerges from the interaction region and
again
becomes a solution of the free-particle equation:
![]() |
(6.87) |
All information about the scattered wave may be obtained from the
probability amplitude for the particle to arrive in various final free
states as
for a given incident
wave
.
The probability amplitude for a give pair
is an element of the
-matrix (or scattering matrix)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
(6.88) |
where
is the solution of the wave equation
(6.14) which reduces to a plane wave of momentum
, as
.
The superscript
over the
is meant to express the fact that
we are dealing with a wave which propagates into the future.
We may expand
in a multiple scattering series by
iteration of equation 6.14 and thus express the
-matrix in a
multiple scattering series.
The
-matrix is the matrix which transforms the incoming state into
the outgoing scattering state.
Finally, if we insert
from the iterated
solution of equation 6.27, we get an expression for the
-matrix in terms of multiple scattering events
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
(6.89) |
The first term (the -function) does not describe scattering but
characterizes the particle flux without scattering.
The second term represents single scattering, the third term double
scattering, etc.
They are coherently summed to give the total
-matrix element.
For the relativistic case, the -matrix elements are defined in the
same manner as in the nonrelativistic case.
Terming
the final free wave with the quantum numbers
that is observed at the end of the scattering process, we infer
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(6.90) |
![]() |
![]() |
Here the limit
is understood if
describes an electron and
if
describes a positron, since the latter is considered a negative-energy
electron moving backward in time.
For electron scattering we have
![]() |
(6.91) |
while positron scattering is described by
![]() |
(6.92) |
The integral implied by the brackets projects out just
that state
whose quantum numbers agree with
.
All other terms of the integral-sum,
, do not contribute.
For electron scattering this yields
![]() |
(6.93) |
and a similar expression for positron scattering.
Both results can be combined by writing ( for
positive-energy waves in the future and
for negative
energy waves in the past)
where stands for the incoming wave, which either reduces
at
to an incident positive-frequency wave
carrying quantum number
or at
to an incident negative-frequency wave propagating into the past
with quantum number
, according to Stückelberg-Feynman boundary
conditions.
Equations 6.82 and 6.94 contain the rules for
calculating the pair production and annihilation amplitudes, as well as,
the ``ordinary'' scattering process.
In practice we shall usually calculate only the first non-vanishing
contribution to the matrix for a given interaction.
The validity of this procedure depends on the weakness of the
interaction
and the rapid convergence of this series in powers of
the interaction strength.
The application of the theory to special systems is considerably
simplified by the symmetry properties of the -matrix under charge
conjugation.
The matrix elements of charge conjugation processes are equal.
The photon-positron scattering cross-section is therefore equal to the
photon-electron scattering cross-section.
The Møller cross-section for electron-electron collisions is also
valid for positron-positron collisions.
These examples show that the charge symmetry of the theory reduces
considerably the number of processes which must be calculates.
Arrows on the world line in a Feynman diagram keep track of entry and exit at each vertex. An arrow forward in time implies positive energy, while an arrow backward in time signifies negative energy There is no distinction between particle and antiparticle propagators since the Feynman prescription does both simultaneously.