Geophysics 437: Application of Methods in Environmental and Exploration Geophysics
Fall 2008

Instructor: V. Kravchinsky
TA:
Dennis Rippe
Assignment 3, Weight 20%, due Tuesday, November 4 (5:00pm)

Data Analysis: Filtering the anomalies and modeling the sources

a) Continue with your corrected (but not interpolated) Bouguer gravity anomaly data after planar detrending (your assignment 2 or can be downloaded from here (columns are DE (relative to the base station 2 easting in km), DN (relative northing in km), detrended Bouguer anomaly (mgal))). Interpolate the data onto a plain of constant spacing and with the number of points being a power of 2. This helps with the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Write a program to FFT the interpolated gravity data. Using fftshift(…) in Matlab create a plot of the amplitude spectrum. Scale the horizontal axis using what you know about the Nyquist frequency or Nyquist wavenumber. Comment on what the results show. Describe the mathematical approach used to derive the upward/downward continuation for gravity (see lecture notes, Gunn’s paper and Bhattacharyya’s paper). Please start with an explanation of the gravitational potential derivation.

b) Apply detrending of order 2 or 3 for magnetics instead of planar detrending used in the previous assignment (see lecture notes how to apply higher polynomial detrending). Interpolate your corrected (including detrending) magnetic data onto a uniform 2-dimensional grid with length and width of powers of 2. This task is analogous to part (a). Create an image of the amplitude spectrum. Scale the horizontal axes as in (a).

c) For the gravity data apply the following 2-D filters and produce plots (illustrate every filter along with filtered data maps). For 1), 2) and 3) below choose the filter size that gives easily interpretable results. Briefly discuss your result for every filter.

1) Low pass filter (remove high wavenumbers)
2) High pass filter (remove low wavenumbers)
3) Band pass filter (remove very high and very low wavenumbers)
4) Upward continuation; show two different heights (try different heights, for example, 100m, 1km)
5) Downward continuation; demonstrate with two different heights (for example, start with 50m, 200m)

d) First of all you need to specify smaller area you are going to work with in the magnetic section. The recommended area where two dykes are better registered is limited by coordinates of the current values for the longitude and latitude long_min=443000; long_max=444200; lat_min=5452100; lat_max=5453300. To cut off the specified area in the magnetic dataset you may use the function data_subset prepared by D. Rippe (click here to download).

For the magnetic data, apply the following 2-D filters and produce images. For 1), 2) and 3) below choose filters that give easily interpretable results. Briefly discuss your result for every filter.

1) Low pass filter (remove high wavenumbers)
2) High pass filter (remove low wavenumbers)
3) Band pass filter (remove high and low wavenumbers)
4) Upward continuation (demonstrate with two different heights)
5) Downward continuation (demonstrate with two different heights)
6) Reduction to the Pole (RTP) filter (see Baranov’s paper and Silva’s paper).
For this filter you need to estimate remnant magnetization direction for two cases: normal and reverse polarity remnant magnetization. To estimate the induced magnetization direction go to the web-page: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/geomag/jsp/IGRFWMM.jsp. Here is the dataset of the North American poles from the paper of Besse and Courtillot (2002): B&C02.pdf. Here is the link to the Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale: GPTS.jpg. On the radiogenic age of the Milk River dykes see Links437\Buhkmann-MilkRiverDykes.pdf. Example of the importance of the remanent magnetization to interpret the magnetic anomalies see Lockhart-2004 Kimberlite Canada.pdf.

e) Prepare your filtered dataset for the next assignment (see lecture notes). Conclude on your results. Which filter(s) did perform better to evaluate the subsurface structures in your opinion? Give a short geological interpretation of your gravity data and suggest where to drill a borehole to target a potential aquifer in the area of the survey and why. Briefly discuss your magnetic result: where to drill for reconnaissance purposes of the future diamond exploration and why. 

Materials to hand in:
1) Hard copy of report, including figures (about 10
±2 pages). Combine figures to make your report shorter.
2) Send your scripts and input files by email to me or TA, send your report.

Alternative Geomagnetic Field Calculator: http://williams.best.vwh.net/magvar.htm  
Here from you may download
an example of the FFT prepared for you by Dennis: fft_example.m

Note that all anomalies obtained by different students are slightly different. It may depend on differences in regional trend orientations and does not necessary mean that your estimation of the Bouguer gravity or magnetics was wrong in your report.