Long-Term Memory Processes

 

Learning Outcomes

1. What is levels of processing theory, and what is the evidence for it and against it?

2. Describe how the encoding effects of self-reference and generation influence memory.

3. What is the testing effect and how does it work?

4. How do external context and internal states affect memory?

5. Describe how repetition, spacing of practice, interleaved practice, and sleep affect consolidation of memories.

6. How are memories stored in the brain?

7. Contrast the standard model of systems consolidation with the multiple trace theory of consolidation.

 


 

Encoding

 

Levels of Processing Theory (Fergus I.M. Craik & Lockhart, 1972):

Encoding processes:

shallow (e.g., __________: based on appearance of a word)

intermediate (e.g., ________: based on sound of a word)

deep (e.g., ________: based on meaning of a word)

 

“Deeper” encoding enhances memory. Why?

___________ rehearsal: repetitive processing

e.g., repeating a phone number over and over

 

___________ rehearsal: more meaningful processing, relating item to other knowledge

e.g., grouping digits in a phone number into meaningful patterns

- may work by organizing, connecting, or integrating memories (Bellezza et al., 1977; Mandler, 1979)

 

Evidence:

Craik & Tulving (1975):

- participants given a list of words; asked to do one of three tasks:

• case: Is the word in capital letters?

• rhyme: Does the word rhyme with weight?

• sentence: Does the word fit in this sentence: “He met a _____ in the street”?

- measured recognition performance and latency on incidental (surprise) memory test

 

recognition as a function of task type         latency as a function of task type

 

- is performance due to processing ____?

• structural task: Does word match this pattern of consonants and vowels?

e.g. CCVVC

• semantic task: Does word fit in this sentence?

e.g., “The man threw a ball to the ______.”

- results:

Task:

Time

Recognition

  structural

1.70 s

57%

  semantic

0.83 s

82%

 

- depth of processing more important than processing ____

 

Problems:

☒ What does “______” mean?

- ________ definition: deeper → better memory

 

☒ Morris, Bransford, & Franks (1977): marching encoding and retrieval

- encoding task: given the word table

• phonetic/rhyming: Does it rhyme with cable?

• semantic: Does it fit in this sentence?

“Put the dish on the _____.”

 

- incidental recognition tests:

• phonetic/rhyming: Circle what rhymes with word presented earlier:

Fable    Desk    Window

• semantic: Circle word presented earlier:

Table    Desk    Window

 

- results:

 remembering as a function of encoding and retrieval

- memory performance not dependent on depth alone

- also depends on _____ between encoding processes and type of test

 

☒ Kapur, Craik, Tulving, & colleagues (1994):

- shallow task: Does the word contain the letter a ?

- deep task: Does word represent a living thing?

- better recognition for deep task

cortical activation

- greater activation in left inferior __________ cortex during a deep task

- shows more activity, not deeper activity

 

Other Encoding Factors

 

____-_________ effect (Rogers, Kuiper, & Kirker, 1977): memory is enhanced by relating items to one’s self

- presented 40 adjectives to participants

e.g., kind, rigid, brave, etc.

- words evaluated one of four ways:

• structural, phonemic, or semantic tasks

• ____-_________ group asked if each adjective described them

- results of incidental recall test:

self-reference effect

- self-reference group surpassed semantic encoding group

 

__________ effect (Mäntylä, 1986): memory is enhanced for items that are actively produced

- presented 600 nouns (e.g., banana, freedom, tree)

- task: generate 3 cue words associated with each noun (e.g., yellow, bunches, edible for banana)

• Gp1: generated cue words

• Gp2: saw the nouns, and the 3 cue words generated by other participants

• Gp3: just saw the 3 cue words generated by other participants

- results of incidental recall test of nouns:

generation effect

 

- self-generated cues lead to better remembering

- cues were most helpful when they were both __________ with the target word and ___________

e.g., given the noun coat, the cue jacket is compatible and distinctive, but wool is not (it may cue other nouns like fabric and sheep)

 


 

Retrieval

 

Testing effect (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006):

- stimuli: two prose passages from TOEFL prep book (~260 words each)

- learning conditions:

• study, study: 7 minutes of studying, retention interval, another 7 minutes of studying

• study, test: 7 minutes of studying, retention interval, 7 minutes of testing

- retention interval:

• 5 minutes, 2 days, or 1 week

- results:

testing effect

- conclusion: _______ (via retrieval practice) improves long-term retention

 

How does the testing effect work?

• additional (focused) presentation of material

• _________ itself is a memory modifier, with increasing retrieval demand/effort enhancing later retention

• processes applied during an initial test are also used during the final test, resulting in positive transfer (i.e., a ________ effect)

 


 

Matching Encoding & Retrieval

 

Encoding specificity principle: if conditions at retrieval match those at encoding, memory is enhanced (Tulving & Thomson, 1973)

 

External Cues

_______-_________ memory: memory enhancement that occurs when retrieval context matches encoding context

(Note: The textbook refers to context-dependent memory as “encoding specificity.”)

 

Godden & Baddeley (1975):

- scuba divers given a list of 36 unrelated words via diver underwater communication sets:

a) underwater, or b) on land

- recalled words in same (matched) or different (mismatched) context

- results:

Godden & Baddeley (1975)

• different contexts: 24% correct

• same context: 35% correct

- evidence for context-dependent memory

- strong ____________ for scuba divers & remembering!

 

Context effects obtained for:

• music: Mozart vs. jazz vs. quiet (Smith, 1985)

• background colours (Dulsky, 1935)

• smell of _________ (Schab, 1990), but not unpleasant odours (Rotton, 1983)

 

Bjork & colleagues (1978):

- participants given a list of 40 four-letter nouns, studied in two sessions

- sessions were held in the same room _____, or in two different rooms:

• context 1: small, cluttered, windowless room

• context 2: room in a modern building with windows overlooking a courtyard

- students were tested in a third, “neutral” room

- results:

• students who studied in the same room twice: 40% correct

• students who studied in two different rooms: 61% correct

- implication: studying in a variety of contexts leads to better remembering, greater stability and “________________” of knowledge

 

Internal States

_____-_________ memory: if internal state during retrieval matches that during encoding, memory may be enhanced

e.g., mood or emotional state, physiological arousal, sober/_____ states (Eich, 1980)

 

mood __________: when mood at retrieval matches the mood at encoding, memory is facilitated--however, the memories themselves are typically not emotional in nature (Lewis & Critchley, 2003)

 

mood __________: mood at retrieval influences the kind of memories retrieved

e.g., in a sad mood, you’re more likely to remember sad events

- implicated in vicious cycle of depression (Baddeley, 1993)

 


 

Transfer of Information

 

_____________: process of integrating new information into stored knowledge

 

Practice Effects

• savings curve (Ebbinghaus, 1885):

- more initial ________ → less time to relearn list of nonsense syllables the next day (savings)

Ebbinghaus (1885)

 

• spacing effect (Bahrick, 1979):

- participants learned English translations for 50 Spanish words by completing six training sessions

- kinds of training:

▸ ______ practice: information studied repeatedly at one time

▸ ___________ practice (or spaced repetition): information studied repeatedly in separate sessions over a longer period of time

- independent variable: spacing gap

0 days (massed practice)

1 day (distributed practice)

30 days (distributed practice)

- participants were given a final test 1 month after the last training session

- results:

spacing effect

greater spacing between training sessions produced better remembering

follow-up study 8 years later showed 30-day spacing group outperformed the other two (Bahrick & Phelps, 1987)

 

- _______ effect: distributed practice produces better remembering than massed practice

- why?

▸ multiple ________ ________ theory: multiple study sessions lead to multiple types of encoding, thus greater chance of matching during test conditions

▸ ___ theory: the more rapid eye movement sessions following study sessions, the more consolidation that occurs

 

Kornell & Bjork (2008): interleaved practice

- goal: identify painting styles of different artists by inductive learning (observing _________)

- stimuli were multiple landscape paintings by relatively unfamiliar artists, including Henri-Edmond Cross, Marilyn Mylrea, and YeiMei

- independent variable was the nature of practice

_______ practice: participants studied artists one at a time (e.g., 6 paintings by Cross presented consecutively, followed by 6 by Mylrea, etc.)

___________ practice: participants studied artists mixed up (e.g., 1 painting by Cross, then 1 by YeiMei, then 1 by Mylrea, etc.)

- both groups studied 6 paintings by each of 12 artists, then were tested with 4 previously unseen paintings each of the 12 artists

- results:

blocked: 50% correct

interleaved: ___ correct

- in one experiment, participants experienced both blocked and interleaved practice: 78% of participants did better with interleaved practice

- but when asked to rate practice effectiveness, ___ rated blocking as good as (or better than) interleaving

- conclusion: ____________ enhances inductive learning of concepts and categories

- implications: even though it may seem less effective, to maximize learning of different concepts, multiple examples should be presented and practiced interleaved

- interleaving has been shown to work in basketball, baseball, identifying birds, electrocardiogram interpretation, learning microsurgery, and assessing complex legal scenarios

- may work by requiring the learner to differentiate among related concepts, or to retrieve the correct strategy for each different type of problem

 

• spaced vs. interleaved practice:

- interleaving can be seen as a subtype of spacing

spaced vs. massed diagram

interleaved vs. blocked diagram

 

REM/Sleep Effects

• David Hartley (1791) was the first to suggest ________ might alter the strength of associative memories

• ___ sleep was discovered by Aserinski & Kleitman (1953); linked it to dreaming

• REM sleep has been found to improve learning complex _____ games, foreign ________ acquisition, visual discrimination tasks, and intensive ________

• may be due to ___________ brain activity, neuronal replay, changes in _______________, or regional brain activation (Stickgold, Hobson, Fosse, & Fosse, 2001)

 

Contradictory evidence (Siegel, 2001; Vertes & Eastman, 2000):

• results of animal studies are equivocal: REM deprivation does not necessarily impair learning/memory

• REM deprivation confounded with ______

• some _______________ suppress REM sleep, but learning/memory is not disrupted

• bilateral lesions of ____ abolish REM sleep, but patients led normal lives

• conclusion: REM sleep has no role in _____________

 

What about the effects of sleep overall?

• sleep deprivation reduces _______ memory by 38%

• sleep increases performance of procedural memories, like motor skill learning

• daytime ____ enhance declarative memories, maze learning, complex visual stimuli, paired words); performance correlated with the amount of NREM (non-REM) sleep

 

Conclusions:

• sleep has an important role in memory, attention, and executive function (Lowe et al., 2017)

• sleep actively promotes __________ of information learned during wakefulness

• sleep is important, not only for memory consolidation, but also for memory ___________

 


 

Neurons, the Brain, and Memory

 

Dual trace hypothesis (Donald Hebb, 1949):

- memory formation (synaptic consolidation) requires two processes:

1. short term: experience causes activity in certain neural ________

2. longer term: continuous or repeated activity creates ______ change in nervous system

- “neurons that fire together, wire together”

- found in ____-____ potentiation (LTP): electrically induced changes in neural response (Hawkins & Kandel, 1984)

- kinds of neural change found to support learning:

• increased ________________ released

• increased ____ of postsynaptic region

• ____ synapses formed

 

Standard Model of Systems Consolidation (Squire & Alvarez, 1995):

- initially, incoming information activates cortical areas (e.g., for vision, audition, etc.), and is integrated and coordinated by the hippocampus into a memory trace

- consolidation occurs via ____________:

• hippocampus reactivates connections to the cortex associated with a memory

• occurs during sleep or by conscious rehearsal of a memory

- after repeated reactivation, long-lasting cortical interconnections are strengthened and/or new connections established

• new memories are integrated with existing ones

• activity in the hippocampus is no longer required

Standard Model of Systems Consolidation

- predicts that retrograde amnesia (due to damaged hippocampus) should be temporally graded: memories formed closest in time to the traumatic event are most likely to be lost

 

Multiple Trace Theory of Consolidation (Nadel & Moscovitch, 1997)

- proposes that semantic memories stored in the cortex gradually become ___________ of the hippocampus (as in the Standard Model)

Multiple Trace Theory of Consolidation

- in contrast, all episodic memories always involve the hippocampus, which provides spatial and temporal context (where and when)

Multiple Trace Theory of Consolidation

- predicts that complete lesions of the hippocampus should impair all episodic memories--whether recent or remote