Reader Response: A Bibliography

This bibliography is primarily devoted to empirical studies of literary reading (in English) and associated theoretical issues. I have also included selected resources in discourse studies, but this is an extensive area: interested readers should consult the Psychology of Language web site, maintained by Roger Kreuz. For some of the entries below I am indebted to the Selected Bibliography of Works in the Systemic and Empirical, Institution, and Field Approaches to Literature and Culture (to 1998), compiled by Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek, which offers an alternative (but overlapping) focus. This can be found at: http://clcwebjournal.lib.purdue.edu/library/sysbib97.html.

Latest revision (October 17th 2006).  I should be grateful for notification of additions and/or corrections: please email David.Miall@Ualberta.Ca.

To print this document (currently 42 pages), if there is a frame at the top of the screen, you will need to reload the page as http://www.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/reading/readbib.htm

Aebli, H. (1989). Towards a psychological theory of understanding literary texts.  In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of Literary Discourse: Results and Problems of Interdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 175-89). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Allerup, P. (1985). Why I like to read -- statistical analysis of questionnaire data. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.

Anderson, C. W., & McMaster, G. E. (1982). Computer assisted modeling of affective tone in written documents. Computers and the Humanities, 16, 1-9.

Anderson, C. W., & McMaster, G. E. (1992). Pantextual indices of emotional tone. In E. F. Nardocchio (Ed.), Reader response: The empirical dimension (pp. 35-56).  Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Andringa, E. (1989). Developments in literary reading: Aspects, perspectives and questions. SPIEL, 8,  1-24.

Andringa, E. (1990). Verbal data on literary understanding: A proposal for protocol analysis on two levels. Poetics, 19, 231-257.

Andringa, E. (1991). Talking about literature in an institutional context: An empirical approach. Poetics, 20, 157-72.

Andringa, E. (1991). Expert readers 'before the law.'  In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 39-48). Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Andringa, E. (1994). Literary narrative and mental representation or how readers deal with "A Rose for Emily". In H. van Oostendorp & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension. Vol. LIII, Advances in discourse processes (pp. 247-268). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Andringa, E. (1994). Literature: Empirical studies. In  R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 4 (pp. 2266-71). Oxford: Pergamon.

Andringa, E. (1996). Effects of 'narrative distance' on readers' emotional involvement and response. Poetics, 23, 431-452.

Andringa, E. (2004). How literature enters life. Poetics Today, 25, 161-398.

Andringa, E. (2004). The interface between fiction and life: Patterns of identification in reading autobiographies. Poetics Today, 25, 205-240.

Andringa, E., & Davis, S. (1994). Literary narrative and mental representation or how readers deal with "A Rose for Emily." In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 247-268). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Andringa, E., & Viehoff, R. (1990). Literary understanding. Poetics: Journal for Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts, 19, 221-230.

Asplund, M., Marton, F., & Halasz, L. (1993). Reader's experience and textual meaning: An empirical study. Journal of Literary Semantics, 22, 104-123.

Asplund-Carlsson, M., Pramling Samuelsson, I., Soponyai, A., & WenQuifang (2001). The Dog's Tale: Chinese, Hungarian and Swedish children's narrative conventions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9, 181-191.

Asplund Carlsson, M., Fülöp, M., & Marton, F. (2001). Peeling the onion: Student teachers' conceptions of literary understanding. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 5-18.

Bailey, R.W. (1971). Statistics and the sounds of poetry. Poetics, 1, 16-37.

Bal, M. (1984). Introduction: Delimiting psychopoetics. Poetics, 13, 279-98.

Bange, P. (1986). Towards a pragmatic analysis of narratives in literature. Poetics, 15, 73-89.

Barney, T. (1996). Phonetics and the empirical study of poetry. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 309-328). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Barney, T. (1999). Readers as text processors and performers: A new formula for poetic intonation. Discourse Processes, 28, 155-167.

Barsch, A. (1991). The empirical theory of literature and systems theory.  In E. Ibsch, D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 355-62). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Barsch, A. (1996). Popular fiction—A subsystem of the literary system? The problem of literary evaluation. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 687-696). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Barwell, I. (1986). How does art express emotion? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 45, 175-181.

Beach, R. & Beaugrande R. de (1988). Authority attitudes in reader response. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 227-56). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.

Beentjes, J. W. J. & van der Voort, T. H. A. (1991). Recall and language usage in retellings of televised and printed stories. Poetics, 20, 91-104.

Beers, T. (1987). Schema-theoretic models of reading: Humanizing the machine. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 369-377.

Bellezza, F. S., & Bower, G. H. (1982). Remembering script-based text. Poetics, 11, 1-23.

Benjafield, J. & Muckenheim, R. (1989). An historico-developmental analysis of the Regressive Imagery Dictionary. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 79-88.

Berntsen, D., & Larsen S. F. (1996). Personal and nonpersonal narrativity in reading. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 615-631). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Bestgen, Y. (1994). Can emotional valence in stories be determined from words? Cognition and Emotion, 8, 21-36.

Beyers, C., & Golitsyn, G. A. (1994). Information and emotions in literature and art. SPIEL, 13, 72-88.

Biermann, I. (1993). Intertextuality as parallelism in two South African poems. Language and Literature, 2, 197-220.

Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1979). Episodes as chunks in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 309-318.

Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem-solving. Poetics, 9, 223-250.

Bleich, D. (1986). Intersubjective reading. New Literary History, 17, 401-421.

Bleich, D. (1989). The double perspective as an interpretive style and as a research technique. Poetics, 18, 405-33.

Bogdan, D. (1999). Musical/literary boundaries in Northrop Frye. Changing English: Studies in Reading and Culture, 6, 57-79.

Bogdan, D. (2000). Dissociation of sensibility revisited: The logical priority of direct response and feminist pedagogy. Reader: Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy, 43, 33-37.

Bogdan, D. (2001). Musical listening and performance as embodied dialogism. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 9, 3-22.

Bogdan, D. (2003). Musical spirituality: Reflections on identity and the ethics of embodied aesthetic experience in/and the academy. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37, 80-98.

Bogdan, D., Cunningham, E.J., Davis, H.E. (2000). Reintegrating sensibility: Situated knowledges and embodied readers. New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation, 31, 477-507.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Questions of method. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 19-36). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (1996). The effects of formal training on literary reception. Poetics, 23, 471-487.

Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (1997). Science and the study of literature. SPIEL, 16, 67-70.

Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boselie, F. (1991). Against prototypicality as a central concept in aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 65-73.

Bourg, T. (1996). The role of emotion, empathy, and text structure in children's and adults' narrative text comprehension. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 241-260). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Boyarin, J., Ed. (1993). The ethnography of reading. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Braun, I. K., & Cupchik G. C. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 85-109.

Bredin, H. (1996). Onomatopoeia as a figure and a linguistic principle. New Literary History, 27, 555-569.

Brewer, W. F. (1988). Postscript: Imagery and text genre. Text, 8, 431-438.

Brewer, W. F. (1996). Good and bad story endings and story completeness. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 261-274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Brewer, W. F. (2006). Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: A metamemory approach. Memory, 14, 540-552.

Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1981). Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars. In J. Long, & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473-486.

Brewer, W. F., & Ohtsuka, K. (1988). Story structure, charcterization, just world organization, and reader affect in American and Hungarian short stories. Poetics, 17, 395-416.

Britton, B., & Graesser, A. (Eds.) (1996). Models of understanding text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Brogan, T. V. F. (1993). The foundations of verse: A commentary. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, 61-7.

Brooke, R. (1984). Three models of narrative comprehension in William Stafford's 'Travelling Through the Dark': Some relations between schemata and interpretive context. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2, 173-93.

Bruce, B. (1980). Analysis of interacting plans as a guide to the understanding of story structure. Poetics 9, 295-312.

Bürger, P. (1989). Interpretation after Duchamp. In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of literary discourse: Results and problems of interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 47-55) Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Carlsson, M. A., Marton, F., & Halász, L. (1993). Reader's experience and textual meaning: An empirical study. Journal of Literary Semantics, 22, 104-123.

Carminati, M. N., Stabler, J., Roberts A. M., & Fischer, M. H. (2006). Readers' responses to sub-genre and rhyme in poetry. Poetics, 34, 204-218.

Cerulo, K. A. (2000). The rest of the story: Sociocultural patterns of story elaboration. Poetics, 28, 21-45.

Cirilo, R. K., & Foss, D. J. (1980). Text structure and reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96-109.

Collier, G. and Kuiken, D. (1977). A phenomenological study of the experience of poetry. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 7, 250-273.

Columbus, C. K. (2006). Many-sided analogies in Arguedas, Asturias, and Malouf. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 105-120.

Colston, H. L., & Katz, A. N. (Eds.). (2005). Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-14.

Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and literature: The interplay of form and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cooper, C. R., Ed. (1985). Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Craig, H. (2000). Is the author really dead? An empirical study of authorship in English Renaissance drama. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 119-134.

Crites, S. (1971). The narrative quality of experience. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 39, 291-311.

Cupchik, G. C. (1991). Unity in the esthetic process. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 49-55). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Cupchik, G. C. (1993). Component and relational processing in aesthetics. Poetics, 22, 171-83.

Cupchik, G. C. (1995). Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177-88.

Cupchik, G. C. (1999). The thinking-I and the being-I in psychology of the arts. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 165-173.

Cupchik, G. C. (2002). The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept. Culture and Psychology, 8, 155-188.

Cupchik, G. C., & László, J. (1994). The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 297-312.

Cupchik, G. C. & Leonard, G. (2001). High and popular culture from the viewpoints of psychology and cultural studies. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp. 421-441). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Cupchik, G. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E., & Kalin, J. D. (1998). The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 825-847.

Cupchik, G. C., Leonard, G., & Irvine-Kopetski, D. (1998). Advertisements: Multileveled in word and image and in the mind of the beholder. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 115-135.

Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25, 363-377.

Cupchik, G. C., & Phillips, K. (2005). The scent of literature. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 101-119.

Dailey, A., Martindale, C., & Borkum, J. (1997). Creativity, synesthesia and physiognomic perception. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 1-8.

Davis, S. N. (1988). A dialogue approach to the reader/text relationship. SPIEL, 7, 261-80.

De Beaugrande, R. (1978). Information, expectation, and processing: On classifying poetic texts. Poetics, 7, 3-44.

De Beaugrande, R. (1983). Surprised by syncretism: Cognition and literary criticism exemplified by E.D. Hirsch, Stanley Fish, and J. Hillis Miller. Poetics, 12, 83-137.

De Beaugrande, R. (1985). Poetry and the ordinary reader: A study of immediate responses. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, 1-22.

De Beaugrande, R. (1987). Schemas for literary communication. In L. Halász (Ed.), Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches (pp. 49-99). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

De Beaugrande, R. (1989). Toward the empirical study of literature: A synoptic sketch of a new society. Poetics, 18, 7-27.

De Beaugrande, R. (1992). Readers responding to literature: Coming to grips with realities. In E. F. Nardocchio (Ed.), Reader response: The empirical dimension (pp. 193-210).  Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

De Beaugrande, R., & Colby, B. N. (1979). Narrative models of action and interaction. Cognitive Science, 3, 43-66.

Denis, M. (1984). Imagery and prose: A critical review of research on adults and children. Text, 4, 381-401.

Den Otter, A. G. (1991). Literary criticism as receptive data rather than interpretive truth: A case study of Christabel criticism. Poetics, 20, 363-90.

Derks, P. L. (1994). Clockwork Shakespeare: The bard meets the Regressive Imagery Dictionary. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 131-39.

De Vega, M., León, & Díaz, J. M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 303-321.

Dijkstra, K. (1991). Literary institutions: The application of literary theories and sociological concepts. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 177-183). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Dijkstra, K. (2001). Old readers: Slow readers or expert readers? In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp 87-105). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Dijkstra, K., Yaxley, R. H., Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The role of age and perceptual symbols in language comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 19, 352-356.

Dijkstra, K., Zwaan, R.A., Graesser, A.C., & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Character and reader emotions in literary texts. Poetics, 23, 139-57.

Dillon, G. L. (1976). Literary transformations and poetics word order. Poetics, 5, 1-22.

Dillon, G. L. (1980). Discourse processing and the nature of literary narrative. Poetics, 9, 163-80.

Dillon, G. L. (1982). Styles of reading. Poetics Today, 3, 77-88.

Dissanayake, E. (1984). Does art have selective value? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2, 35-50.

Dissanayake, E. (1988). What is art for? Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. New York: Free Press.

Dissanayake, E. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Dissayanake, E. (2001). Aesthetic incunabula. Philosophy and Literature, 25, 335-46.

Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (1996). Literary communication: Effects of reader-narrator co-operation. Poetics, 23, 405-430.

Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (2001). Text is not communication: A challenge to a common assumption. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31, 1-25.

Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (2004). Methods and evidence in psychonarratology and the theory of the narrator: Reply to Diengott. Narrative, 12, 317-325.

Dixon P., & Bortolussi, M. (2005). Approach and selection of popular narrative genre. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 3-17.

Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A. (1993). Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations. Poetics, 22, 5-33.

Dixon, P. & Mannion, D. (2001). Goldsmith and the Public Ledger. Language and Literature: Journal of the Poetics and Linguistics Association, 10, 307-323.

Dollerup, C. (1979). Effect of prereading instructions on readers' responses. Journal of Reading, 23, 112-20.

Dollerup, C., Reventlow, I., & Hansen, C. R. (1990). The Copenhagen Studies in Reader Response. SPIEL, 9, 413-436.

Dollerup, C., & et. al. (1995). The Construction (Summary) and the Collection (Last Progress Report on the Folktale-Project). Folktale: A cross-cultural, interdisciplinary study of the experience of literature. Paper 14. Denmark: Copenhagen University, Department of English.

Dorfman, M. H. (1996). Evaluating the interpretive community: Evidence from expert and novice readers. Poetics, 23, 381-490.

Dyer, M.G. (1983). The role of affect in narratives. Cognitive Science, 7, 211-242.

Eco, U. (1984). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts.  Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Emmott, C. (1999). Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Emmott, C., Sanford, A. J., & Morrow, L. I. (2006). Capturing the attention of readers? Stylistic and psychological perspectives on the use and effect of text fragmentation in narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics, 35, 1-31.

Ericsson, K. A. (1988). Concurrent verbal reports on text comprehension: A review. Text, 8, 295-325.

Esrock, E. (1994). The reader's eye: Visual imaging as reader response.  Baltimore & London: John Hopkins University Press.

Firle, M. (1990). The relationship between poetic and verbal communication. Poetics, 19, 23-32.

Fischer, S. R. (2003). A history of reading. London: Reaktion Books.

Fishelov, D. (1998). The institutional definition of poetry: Some heretical thoughts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 5-13.

Fletcher, C. R., van den Broek, P., & Arthur, E. J. (1996). A model of narrative comprehension and recall. In B. K. Britton, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 141-163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a 'natural' narratology. London & New York : Routledge.

Fludernik, M. (2000). Genres, text types, or discourse modes: Narrative modalities and generic categorization. Style, 34, 274-292.

Fludernik, M. (2000). Beyond structuralism in narratology: Recent developments and new horizons in narrative theory. Anglistik, 11, 83-96.

Fludernik, M. (2003). History of Narratology: A rejoinder. Poetics Today, 24, 405-411.

Fludernik, M. (2003). Natural narratology and cognitive parameters. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences (pp 243-267). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Fludernik, M. (2003). Metanarrative and metafictional commentary: From metadiscursivity to metanarration and metafiction. Poetica, 35, 1-39.

Fludernik, M. (2005). Allegory, metaphor, scene and expression: The example of english medieval and early modern lyric poetry. In E. Müller-Zettelmann & M. Rubik (Eds.). Theory into poetry: New approaches to the lyric (pp. 99-124). Amsterdam: Rodophi.

Fokkema, D. (1988). On the reliability of literary studies. Poetics Today, 9, 529-543.

Fokkema, D. (1991). The concept of convention in literary theory and empirical research. In T. D. Haen, R. Grubel, & H. Lethen (Eds.). Convention and innovation in literature (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fokkema, D. (1991). Changing the canon: A systems theoretical approach. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen, G. (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 363-369). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Fokkema, D. (1996). Empirical studies of the past: How empirical can literary historiography be? In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 679-686). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Fónagý, I. (1989). The metaphor: A research instrument. In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of literary discourse: Results and problems of interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 111-30). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Freund, E. (1987). The return of the reader: Reader-response criticism. London: Methuen.

Frey, E. (1981). Subjective word frequency estimates and their stylistic relevance in literature. Poetics, 10, 395-407.

Gaddy, M., Van den Broek, P., & Sung, Y-C. (2001). The influence of text cues on the allocation of attention during reading. In: T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. (pp. 89-124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Galda, L. (1983). Research in response to literature. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16, 1-17.

Gao Wei, Miall, D. S., Kuiken, D., & Eng, T. (2005). The receptivity of Canadian readers to Chinese literature: Lin Yutang's writings in English. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 33-45.

Garnham, A., &  Mason, J. (1987). Episode structure in memory for narrative text. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 133-44.

Gavins, J., & Steen, G. J. (Eds.). (2003). Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge.

Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Gerrig, R. J. (1996). Participatory aspects of narrative understanding. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 127-142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Gerrig, R. J., & Bernado, A. B. I. (1994). Readers as problem-solvers in the experience of suspense. Poetics, 22, 459-472.

Gerrig, R. J., Brennan, S. E., & Ohaeri, J. O. (2000). What can we conclude from speakers behaving badly? Discourse Processes, 29, 173-78.

Gerrig, R. J., Brennan, S. E., & Ohaeri, J. O. (2001). What characters know: Projected knowledge and projected co-presence. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 81-95.

Gerrig, R. J., & Egidi, G. (2003). Cognitive psychological foundations of narrative experiences. In: D. Herman (Ed.). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences (pp. 33-55). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Gerrig, R. J., & Goldvarg, Y. (2000). Additive effects in the perception of sarcasm: Situational disparity and echoic mention. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 197-208.

Gerrig, R. J., & Horton, W. S. (2001). Of texts and toggles: Categorical versus continuous views of communication. Discourse Processes, 32, 81-87.

Gerrig, R. J., Ohaeri, J. O., & Brennan, S. E. (2000). Illusory transparency revisited. Discourse Processes, 29, 137-159.

Gerrig, R. J., & Rapp, D. N. (2004). Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25, 265-281.

Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992). Do readers mentally represent characters' emotional states? Cognition and Emotion, 6, 89-111.

Goetz, E. T., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Imaginative processes in literary comprehension. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 221-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Goetz, E. T., Sadoski, M., Stowe, M. L., Fetsco, T. G., & Kemp, S. G. (1993). Imagery and emotional response in reading literary text: quantitative and qualitative analyses. Poetics, 22, 35-49.

Goetz, E.. T., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Imaginative processes in literary comprehension: Bringing the text to life. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 221-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Gold, J. (1990). Read for your life: Literature as a life support system. Markham, ON: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.

Golden, J. M., & Guthrie, J. T. (1986). Convergence and divergence in reader response to literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 408-421.

Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., & van den Broek, P. (1999). Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Graesser, A. C. (1993). Introduction. Poetics, 22, 1-3.

Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C., Olde, B., & Pomeroy, V. (1999). Who said what? Source memory for narrator and character agents in literary short stories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 284-300.

Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C., Olde, B., White, K., & Person, N. K. (1999). Who knows what? Propagation of knowledge among agents in a literary story world. Poetics, 26, 143-175.

Graesser, A. C., & Britton, B. K. (1996). Five metaphors for text understanding. In B. K. Britton, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 341-351). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (1997). Cognition. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 292-319). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Graesser, A. C., Kassler, M. A., Dijkstra, K., Kreuz, R. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Allen, B. M. (1995). Comprehending novel mental models of time in Einstein's Dreams. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 348-353). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Graesser, A. C., Kassler, M. A., Kreuz, R. J., & McLain-Allen, B. (1998). Verification of statements about story worlds that deviate from normal conceptions of time: What is true about Einstein's Dreams? Cognitive Psychology, 35, 246-301.

Graesser, A. C. & Klettke, B. (2001). Agency, plot, and a structural affect theory of literary story comprehension. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.). The psychology and sociology of literature (pp. 57-69). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.

Graesser, A. C., & Ottati, V. (1995). Why stories? Some evidence, questions, and challenges. In R. S. Jr. Wyer (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story. Vol. 8, Advances in social cognition (pp. 121-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Graesser, A. C., Person, N., & Johnston, G. S. (1996). Three obstacles in empirical research on aesthetic and literary comprehension. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics (pp. 3-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Graesser, A. C., Swamer, S. S., & Hu, X. (1997). Quantitative discourse psychology. Discourse Processes, 23, 229-263.

Graesser, A. C., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (1999). Situational models and concepts in story comprehension. In S. R. Goldman, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2001). Constructing inferences and relations during text comprehension. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 249-271). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Graesser, A. C., & Zwaan, R. A. (1995). Inference generation and the construction of situation models. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 117-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Graves, B. (1996). The study of literary expertise as a research strategy. Poetics, 23, 385-403.

Graves, B. (2001). Literary expertise and analogical reasoning: Building global themes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 47-63.

Graves, B., & Frederiksen, C. H. (1991). Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative. Poetics, 20, 1-26.

Graves, B., & Frederiksen, C. H. (1996). A cognitive study of literary expertise. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 397-418). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Grimaud, M. (1984). Poetics from psychoanalysis to cognitive psychology. Poetics, 13, 325-45.

Grimaud, M. (1993). Tools for the study of verse. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, 79-82.

Groeben, N. (1980). Empirical methods for the study and interpretation of literature. Discourse Processes, 3, 345-367.

Groeben, N. (1981). The empirical study of literature and literary evaluation. Poetics, 10, 381-94.

Groeben, N. (1981). From theory to practice: The program of empirical research in the German science of literature 1972-1977. Poetics Today, 2, 159-69.

Groeben, N. (1983). The function of interpretation in an empirical science of literature. Poetics, 12, 219-38.

Groeben, N. (2001). Literary creativity. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp 17-34). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Groeben, N., & Schreier, M. (1992). The hypothesis of the polyvalence convention: A systematic survey of the research development from a historical perspective. Poetics, 21, 5-32.

Guðbjörnsdóttir G., & Morra S. (1997). Social and developmental aspects of Icelandic pupils’ interest and experience in Icelandic culture. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41, 141-163.

Guðbjörnsdóttir G., & Morra S. (1998). Cultural literacy: Developmental and social aspects of experience and knowledge of Icelandic culture. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42, 85-99.
 

Haberlandt, K. (1980). Story grammar and reading time of story constituents. Poetics, 9, 99-118.

Hakemulder, J. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Hakemulder, J. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers'  perception. Discourse Processes, 38, 193-218.

Halász, L. (1983). Processing literary works under repeated presentation. Leonardo, 16, 243-244.

Halász, L. (Ed.). (1987). Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Halász, L. (1987). Cognitive and social psychological approaches to literary discourse. In L. Halász (Ed.), Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches (pp. 1-37). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Halász, L. (1988). Affective-structural effect and the characters' perception in reception of short stories. Poetics, 17, 417-38.

Halász, L. (1988). Anticipation in reception of short stories -- an American-Hungarian cross-cultural study. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 159-204). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.

Halász, L. (1988). Social perception and understanding of interaction in the short stories entitled "Everything that rises must converge" and "Brutes" (Barbarians) . In L. Halász (Ed.), Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches (pp. 140-166). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Halász, L. (1989). Social psychology, social cognition, and the empirical study of literature. Poetics, 18, 29-44.

Halász, L. (1991). Emotional effect and reminding in literary processing. Poetics, 20, 247-72.

Halász, L. (1991). Understanding short stories: An American-Hungarian cross-cultural study. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 143-63.

Halász, L. (1991). Effect and reminding in literary text processing. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 79-85). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Halász, L. (1992). Self-relevent reading in literary understanding. In E. F. Nardocchio (Ed.), Reader response to literature: The empirical dimension (pp. 229-45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Halász, L. (1995). President's address. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature - IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 10-15). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Halász, L. (1996). General and personal meaning in literary reading. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 379-396). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Halász, L. (1997). A comparative study of literary and historiographical text: Expectations, characteristics, emotional effect. Pszichologia: Az MTA Pszichologiai Intezetenek Folyoirata, 17, 255-283.

Halász, L. (2001). Psychological differences of reception between literary (fictive) and historiographical (nonfictive) texts. Journal of Literary Semantics, 30, 147-166.

Halász, L. (2002). A comparative study on literary and Freudian text processing. In F. Pereira (Ed.), Literature and psychoanalysis (pp. 3-28). Lisbon: Instituto de Superior Psychologia Aplicada.

Halász, L. (2002). Freud: between arts and science. In R. Tomassoni (Ed.), La psicologia delle arti oggi (pp. 189-199). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Halász, L. (2002). The naive psychology of imagination. In Tohre Kato (Ed.), Art and Environment. Proceedings of IAEA congress (pp. 491-494). Takarazuka: Takarazaka University of Art and Design.

Halász, L., Carlsson, M. A., & Marton, F. (1991). Differences in recall and understanding of literary texts read several times. SPIEL, 10, 235-62.

Halász, L., Short, M. & Varga, A. (2002). A cross cultural study of fictional and nonfictional text understanding. Poetics, 30, 195-219.

Hanauer, D. (1995). The effects of educational background on literary and poetic text categorization judgements. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 338-347). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Hanauer, D. (1995). Literary and poetic text categorization judgements. Journal of Literary Semantics, 24, 187-210.

Hanauer, D. (1996). Integrations of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics, 23, 363-380.

Hanauer, D. (1997). Poetic text processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 26, 157-172.

Hanauer, D. (1997). Reading literature and the world of multi-literacies: The place and function of literature in the next millennium. SPIEL, 16, 152-155.

Hanauer, D. (1998). Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of Formalist, Stylistic and Conventionalist Claims. Poetics Today, 19, 565-580.

Hanauer, D. (1998). The effect of three literary educational methods on the development of genre knowledge: The case of postmodern poetry. Journal of Literary Semantics, 27, 43-57.

Hanauer, D. (1998). The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and encyclopedic items. Poetics, 26, 63-80.

Hanauer, D. (1999). Attention and literary education. Language Awareness, 8, 1-15.

Hanauer, D. (2001). The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22, 295-323.

Hanauer, D. (2001). What we know about reading poetry: Theoretical positions and empirical research. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp 107-128). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hanauer, D., & Waksman, S. (2000). The role of explicit moral points in fable reading. Discourse Processes, 30, 107-132

Hansson, G. (1986). Emotions in poetry: Where are they and how do we find them? In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 275-288). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hansson, G. (1989). How to recognize an 'interpretive community' when you see one. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 163-73.

Hansson, G. (1990). Not a day without a book: On the reading of popular fiction. SPIEL, 9, 277-94.

Hansson, G. (1996). Emotions in poetry: Where are they and how do we find them? In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 275-288). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Harker, W. J. (1987). Literary theory and the reading process. Written Communication, 4, 235-52.

Harker, W. J. (1988). Literary communication: the author, the reader, the text. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22, 5-14.

Harker, W. J. (1989). Information theory and the processing of literary texts. New Literary History, 20, 465-81.

Harker, W. J. (1990). Reader response and the teaching of literature: Is there a teacher in the classroom? Reflections on Canadian Literacy, 8, 69-73.

Harker, W. J. (1992). The intent of the author and the making of literature. SPIEL, 11, 259-68.

Harker, W. J. (1992). Reader response and cognition: Is there a mind in this class? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 26, 217-20.

Harker, W. J. (1994). "Plain sense" and "poetic significance": Tenth-grade readers reading two poems. Poetics, 22, 199-218.

Harker, W. J. (1996). Toward a defensible psychology of literary interpretation. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 645-658). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hauptmeier, H. (1981). Paradigm lost - paradigm regained: The persistence of hermeneutical conceptions in the empiricized study of literature. Poetics, 10, 561-582.

Hauptmeier, H. (1983). Toward an empirical science of literature. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1, 173-192.

Hauptmeier, H., & Viehoff, R. (1983). Empirical research on the basis of bio-epistemology: A new paradigm for the study of literature? Poetics Today, 4, 153-71.

Hauptmeier, H., Meutsch, D., & Viehoff, R. (1987). Literary understanding from an empirical point of view. Siegen: LUMIS-Publications No. 14.

Hauptmeier, H., Meutsch, D., & Viehoff, R. (1989). Empirical research on understanding literature. Poetics Today, 10, 563-604.

Haviland, J. M., & Goldston, R. B. (1992). Emotion and narrative: The agony and the ecstasy. In K. T. Strongman (Eds.), International Review of Studies on Emotion (pp. 219-247). Chichester: John Wiley.

Hayward, M. (1991). A connectionist model of poetic meter. Poetics, 20, 303-17.

Hendon, W. S., & Hendon, R. C. (1991). Barren my wit? The impact of television on reading. Poetics, 20, 319-41.

Hendon, W. S., van Rees, C. J., & Verdaasdonk, H. (1987). Reading practices and preferences. Social and economic aspects. Poetics, 16, 209-368.

Herman, L., Hogenraad, R., & Van Mierlo, W. (2003). Pynchon, postmodernism and quantification: An empirical content analysis of Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow. Language and Literature, 12, 27-41.

Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness -- a neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 179-194.

Hilscher, M.C., & Cupchik, G. C. (2005). Reading, hearing, and seeing poetry performed. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 47-64.

Hodge, R. (1990). Literature as discourse. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hogenraad, R. (2002). Moving targets: The making and molding of a theme. In M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 353-376). New York: John Benjamins.

Hogenraad, R. (2002). The words of swords. In E. Malianov, N. Zakharov, E. Berezina, L. Dorfman, V. Petrov, & C. Martindale (Eds.), Personality, creativity, and art (pp. 380-390). Perm, Russia: Perm State Institute of Art and Culture, Prikamsky Social Institute.

Hogenraad, R. (2002). Fourteen days in October 1962: A content analysis of a nuclear close call (the Cuban Missile Crisis). In E. Malianov, N. Zakharov, E. Berezina, L. Dorfman, V. Petrov, & C. Martindale (Eds.), Personality, creativity, and art (pp. 391-396). Perm, Russia: Perm State Institute of Art and Culture, Prikamsky Social Institute.

Hogenraad, R. (2003). The words that predict the outbreak of wars. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 21, 5-20.

Hogenraad, R. (2005). What the words of war can tell us about the risk of war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 137-151.

Hogenraad, R., & Bestgen, Y. (1989). On the thread of discourse: Homogeneity, trends, and rhythms in texts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 1-22.

Hogenraad, R., McKenzie, D. P., & Péladeau, N. (2003). Force and influence in content analysis: The production of new social knowledge. Quality & Quantity, 37, 221-238.

Hoffstaedter, P. (1987). Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 16, 75-91.

Hoffstaedter-Kohn, P. (1991). Linguistic competence and poetic text processing. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen, G. (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the Second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 87-96). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Holland, N. N. (1968). The dynamics of literary response. New York: Oxford University Press.

Holland, N. N. (1975). 5 readers reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Holland, N. N. (1986). The miller's wife and the professors: Questions about the transactive theory of reading. New Literary History, 17, 423-447.

Holland, N. N. (1988). The brain of Robert Frost: A cognitive approach to literature. New York: Routledge.

Holland, N. N. (2001). The neurosciences and the arts. PsyART, 5, n.p.

Holland, N. N. (2002). Where is a text? A neurological view. New Literary History, 33, 21-38.

Holland, N. N. (2004). The power(?) of literature: A neuropsychological view. New Literary History, 35, 395-410.

Holland, N. N. (Ed). (2004). The 21st international literature and psychology conference: Selected papers. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Psychological Study of the Arts, University of Florida.

Honeck, R., Sugar, J., & Kibler, C. T. (1982). Stories, categories, and figurative meaning. Poetics, 11, 127-144.

Hoorn, J. F. (1996). Psychophysiology and literary processing: ERPs to semantic and phonological deviations in reading small verses. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 339-358). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hoorn, J. F. (2000). How is a genre created? Five combinatory hypotheses. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture: A WWWeb Journal 2: 2.

Hoorn, J. F. (2000). The hazard of hidden interactions: A reanalysis of designs in reaction-time studies on metaphor. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture: A WWWeb Journal, 2.3.

Hoorn, J. F. (2000). Actor's identity. In E. A. Konijn (ed.), Acting emotions. Shaping emotions on stage. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Hoorn, J. F. (2001). A renaissance perspective on the empirical study of literature. An example from psychophysiology. In D. H. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp. 129-143). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Hoorn, J. F. (2001). Novel metaphor in the theory of figurativeness: A cognitive viewpoint. Studia Germanica Gandensia, 1, 78-82.

Hoorn, J. F. (2002). A model for information technologies that can be creative. In T. T. Hewett, & T. Kavanagh (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth creativity and cognition conference, Loughborough, UK (pp. 186-191). New York: ACM Press.

Hoorn, J. F. (1997/2002). Metaphor and the brain: Behavioral and psychophysiological research into literary metaphor processing (Doctoral dissertation, Free University, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (12-B), 5988. (UMI No. 3037801).

Hoorn, J. F., Frank, S. L., Kowalczyk, W., & Van der Ham, F. (1999). Neural network identification of poets using letter sequences. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 14, 311-338.

Hoorn, J. F., & Konijn, E. A. (2003). Perceiving and experiencing fictional characters: An integrative account. Japanese Psychological Research, 45: 4, 221-239.

Hoorn, J. F., Konijn, E. A., & Van der Veer, G. C. (2003). Virtual reality: Do not augment realism, augment relevance. Upgrade - human-computer interaction: Overcoming barriers, 4, 18-26.

Hort, M., & Laver, S., Eds. (1997). Emotion and the arts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hunt, R. A. (1987). Shunting information or making contact? Assumptions for research on aesthetic reading. English Quarterly, 20, 131-36.

Hunt, R. A. (1989). Learning to converse with texts: some real readers, some real texts, and the pragmatic situation. SPIEL, 8, 107-30.

Hunt, R. A. (1991). Subverting the literary system: Nonhegemonic literary socialization. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 275-80). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Hunt, R. A. (1996). Literacy as dialogic involvement: Methodological implications for the empirical study of literary reading. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 479-494). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hunt, R. A. (1999). Conditions of reception, conditions of construction: The strange case of 'Mons, Anzac and Kut.' Poetics, 26, 455-468.

Hunt, R. A. (2000). Reading reader, reading readers. Reader: Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy, 43, 47-51.

Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1985). Crash-testing a transactional model of literary reading. Reader: Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, 14, 23-39.

Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1986). Evaluations in literary reading. Text, 6, 53-71.

Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1987). Aesthetic reading: Some strategies for research. English Quarterly, 20, 178-83.

Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1991). First, catch the rabbit: the methodological imperative and the dramatization of dialogic reading. Poetics, 20, 577-95.

Ibsch, E. (1986). On the empirical validation of hypotheses concerning reception aesthetics. Neohelicon, 13, 235-41.

Ibsch, E. (1988). Observer and participant in literary communication. Poetics Today, 9, 515-27.

Ibsch, E. (1989). 'Facts' in the empirical study of literature: The United States and Germany: A comparison. Poetics, 18, 389-404.

Ibsch, E. (1989). Motivations, epistemological considerations, concepts of literature, and aims of research in the empirical study of literature in the United States and Germany. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 99-114.

Ibsch, E. (1991). Opening address: An oral introduction. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen, G. (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 3-7). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Ibsch, E. (1996). The strained relationship between the empiricist's notion of validity and the hermeneutician's notion of relevance. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 23-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Ibsch, E. (2000). The conscience of humankind. Amsterdam: Rodophi.

Ibsch, E., Schram, D., & Steen, G. (Eds.) (1991). Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989. Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Ibsch, E., & Schreier, M. (2001). Reading Holocaust literature: An interview study. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 65-84.

Ide, N. M., and Veronis, J. (1990). Artificial intelligence and the study of literary narrative. Poetics, 19, 37-63.

Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Janssen, S. & Dijk, N. van. (Eds.) (1998). The empirical study of literature and the media: Current approaches and perspectives. Rotterdam: Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn & Co’s.

Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception (T. Bahti, Trans.). Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.

Johnson, N. S. and Mandler, J. M. (1980). A tale of two structures: Underlying and surface forms in stories. Poetics, 9, 51-86.

Jonas, H. (1990). Empirical research into reception and the methodology of literature. Poetics, 19, 465-73.

Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F. (1984). Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20, 911-924.

Kamphuis, J. (1991). Satisfaction with books: Some empirical findings. Poetics, 20, 471-85.

Kantz, M. (1987). Toward a pedagogically useful theory of literary reading. Poetics, 16, 155-68.

Karpen, J. (1984). Literature and the triune brain: A speculative essay. Journal of Literary Semantics, 13, 125-146.

Katz, A. N. (1983). Creativity and individual differences in asymmetric cerebral hemispheric functioning. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1, 3-16.

Katz, A. N. (1985). Setting the record right: comments on creativity and hemispheric functioning. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, 109-113.

Katz, A. N. (1986). The relationships between creativity and cerebral hemisphericity for creative architects, scientists, and mathematicians. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 97-108.

Katz, A. N. (Ed.) (2000). The uses and processing of irony and sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 1-116 (Special issue).

Katz, A. N., & Ferretti, T. R. (2001). Moment-by-moment reading of proverbs in literal and nonliteral contexts. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 193-221.

Katz, A. N., & Ferretti, T. R. (2003). Reading proverbs in context: The role of explicit markers. Discourse Processes, 36, 19-46.

Kaup, B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 439-446.

Keen, S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14, 207-236.

Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, W. S. (2000). Conventional language: How metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 576-593.

Kimmel, M. (2005). From metaphor to the "mental sketchpad": Literary macrostructure and compound image schemas in Heart of Darkness. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 199-238.

Kindt, W. (1981). Some foundational and methodological problems of the empirical theory of literature. Poetics, 10, 483-513.

Kintgen, E. R. (1983). The perception of poetry. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Kintgen, E. R. (1986). Expectations and processes in reading poetic narratives. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 79-95.

Kintgen, E. R., & Holland, N. N. (1984). Carlos reads a poem. College English, 46, 478-491.

Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9, 87-98.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.

Klemenz-Belgardt, E. (1981). American research on response to literature: The empirical studies. Poetics, 10, 357-380.

Klinger, E. (1978). The flow of thought and its implications for literary communication. Poetics, 7, 191-205.

Kneepkens, E. W. E. M., & Zwaan, R.A. (1995). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125-38.

Knulst, W. (1991). Is television viewing substituting reading? Changes in media usage 1975-1985. Poetics, 20, 53-72.

Knulst, W. & Broek van den, A. (2003). The readership of books in times of de-reading. Poetics, 31, 213-233.

Köck, W. K. (1987). Biosystems theory and empirical aesthetics. Poetics, 17, 401-39.

Konijn, E. A. (1999). Spotlight on spectators: Emotions in the theatre. Discourse Processes, 28, 169-194.

Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2000). Perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. In P. Locher & L. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVI congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics, New York, August 9-12, 2000. Upper Montclair, NJ, USA: Montclair State University.

Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2004). Reality-based genre preferences do not direct personal involvement. Discourse Processes, 38, 219-246.

Kraaykamp, G. (2003). Literary socialization and reading preferences. Effects of parents, the library, and the school. Poetics, 31, 235-257.

Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1993). The empirical study of figurative language in literature. Poetics, 22, 151-69.

Kuiken, D., Bears, M., Miall, D. S., Smith, L. (2001-02). Eye movement desensitization reprocessing facilitates attentional orienting. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 21, 3-20.

Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (1995). Procedures in think aloud studies: Contributions to the phenomenology of literary response. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 50-60). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Kuiken, D., and Miall, D. S. (2001). Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. FQS. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2, February 2001.

Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25, 171-203.

Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D. S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A. (2004). Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes, 38, 267-286.

Kurtz, V. & Schober, M. F. (2001). Readers' varying interpretations of theme in short fiction. Poetics, 29, 139-166.

Larsen, S. F. (1993). Studying reading as a social activity by the memorable books method. SPIEL, 12, 206-216.

Larsen, S. F. (1996). Memorable books: Recall of reading and its personal context. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 583-600). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Larsen, S. F., & Laszló, J. (1990). Cultural-historical knowledge and personal experience in the appreciation of literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 425-440.

Larsen, S. F., Laszló, J., & Seilman, U. (1991). Across time and place: Cultural-historical knowledge and personal experience in the appreciation of literature. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 97-103). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Larsen, S. F., & Seilman, U. (1988). Personal remindings while reading literature. Text, 8, 411-429.

László, J. (1986). Same story with different point of view. SPIEL, 5, 1-22.

László, J. (1987). Understanding and enjoying.  In L. Halász (Ed.), Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches (pp. 113-124). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.

László, J. (1988). Readers' historical-social knowledge and their interpretation and evaluation of a short story. Poetics, 17, 61-82.

László, J. (1988). Literary text, literary context and reader expectations. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 205-226). Hamburg: Buske.

László, J. (1990). Images of social categories vs. images of literary and non-literary objects. Poetics, 19, 277-91.

László, J. (1992). The psychology of literature: A social-cognitive approach. In Gerald C. Cupchik & Janos László (Eds.), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy (pp. 210-226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

László, J. (1996). Three forms of knowledge in empirical study of interpretation of literary narratives. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 635-644). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

László, J. (2004). Narrative psychology's contribution to the second cognitive revolution. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 337-354.

László, J. (2005). Narrative psychology as cultural and evolutionary psychology. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 287-300.

László, J., & Cupchik, G. C. (1995). The role of affective processes in reading time and time experience during literary reception. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 25-37.

László, J., & Cupchik, G. C. (2003). Psychology of literary narratives: Studies of identity and conflict. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 21, 1-4. (21:1 is a special issue).

László, J., & Larsen, S. F. (1991). Cultural and text variables in processing personal experiences while reading literature. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 23-34.

László, J., Meutsch, D., &  Viehoff, R. (1988). Verbal reports as data in text comprehension research: An introduction. Text, 8, 283-94.

László, J., & Pólya, T. (2002). The role of the narrative perspective in the cognitive-cultural context. In C. F. Graumann, & W. Kallmeyer (Eds.), Perspective and perspectivation in discourse (pp 375-387). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Lehiste, L. (1992). The phonetics of metrics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 10, 95-120.

Lehnert, W. G. (1981). Plot units and narrative summarization. Cognitive Science, 4, 293-331.

Leontiev, D. A. & Kharchevin, S. P. (1994). Types and levels of literature comprehension: Assessment through free descriptions. SPIEL, 13, 89-100.

Leontiev, D. A. & Yemeyanov, G. A. (1994). Catching psychological effects of poetic form: Experiments with parodies and translations. SPIEL, 13, 101-13.

Levorato, M. C., & Nemesio, A. (2005). Readers' responses while reading a narrative text. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 19-31.

Lindauer, M. S. (1987). The psychology of literature and the short story: A methodological perspective. In L. Halász (Ed.), Literary discourse: Aspects of cognitive and social psychological approaches (pp. 125-139). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter

Lindauer, M. (1988). Physiognomic meanings in the titles of short stories. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 74-95). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.

Lindemann, B. (1988). Settings: Some cognitive issues in the theory of genres. Journal of Literary Semantics, 17, 3-19.

Livingston, P. (1992). Texts, works, and literature. SPIEL, 11, 197-210.

Livingston, P., & Mele, A. R. (1997). Evaluating emotional responses to fiction. In Hort, M, & Laver, S. (Eds), Emotion and the arts (pp. 157-176). New York: Oxford University Press.

Long, E. (2003). Book clubs: Women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Long, D., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). Differences between oral and literary discourse: The effects of pragmatic information on recognition memory. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen, G. (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 105-109). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Louwerse, M. & van Peer, W. (Eds.) (2002). Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Magliano, J. P., Baggett, W. B., & Graesser, A. C. (1996). A taxonomy of inference categories that may be generated during the comprehension of literary texts. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 201-220). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying interference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193-232.

Magliano, J. P., Schleich, M. C., & Millis, K. K. (1998). Discourse process and its relevance to the Web. In C. Forsythe, & E. Grose (Eds.), Web development (pp. 45-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.

Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading.  New York: Knopf.

Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsch, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694­712.

Martindale, A. E., & Martindale, C. (1991). Stimulus and temperament as determinants of imaginative reactions to texts. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, and G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 111-16). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Martindale, C. (1975). Romantic progression: The psychology of literary history. Washington: Hemisphere.

Martindale, C. (1978). Preface: Psychological contributions to poetics. Poetics, 7, 121-33.

Martindale, C. (1978). Sit with statisticians and commit a social science: Interdisciplinary aspects of poetics. Poetics, 7, 273-82.

Martindale, C. (1986). Aesthetic evolution. Poetics, 15, 439-473.

Martindale, C., Ed. (1988). Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.

Martindale, C. (1991). Chaos theory, strange attractors, and the laws of literary history. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 381-385). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Martindale, C. (1996). Empirical questions deserve empirical answers. Philosophy and Literature, 20, 347-361.

Martindale, C. (1997). The laws of literary history. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek, and I. Sywenky (Eds.). The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp 75-82). Edmonton, AB/ Siegen, Germany: Research Institute for Comparative Literature and Cross-Cultural Studies, University of Alberta/ Institute for Empirical Literature and Media Research, Siegen University.

Martindale, C. (2001). The proper place of humanism: Qualitative versus scientific studies of literature. In D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp 395-405). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1995). I. A. Richards revisited: Do people agree in their interpretations of literature? Poetics, 23, 299-314.

Martindale, C., & Martindale, A. (1988). Historical evolution of content and style in nineteenth- and twentieth-century American short stories. Poetics, 17, 333-56.

Martindale, C., Moore, K. & West, A. (1988). Relationship of preference judgments to typicality, novelty, and mere exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 79-96.

Martindale, C., & West, A. N. (2002). Quantitative hermeneutics: Inferring the meaning of narratives from trends in their content. In M. Louwerse, & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp 377-395). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Martins, D. (1982). Influence of affect on comprehension of a text. Text, 2, 141-154.

May, C. E. (1984). The nature of knowledge in short fiction. Studies in Short Fiction, 21, 327-338.

McCabe, A., & Peterson, C. (1984). What makes a good story? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 457-480.

McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.

Meutsch, D. (1986). Mental models in literary discourse: Towards the integration of linguistic and psychological levels of description. Poetics, 15, 307-331.

Meutsch, D. (1987). Cognitive processes in reading literary texts: The influence of context, goals and situations. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 5, 115-37.

Meutsch, D. (1988). Active readers in literary comprehension: An interdisciplinary framework. Mosaic, 21, 139-47.

Meutsch, D. (1989). How to do thoughts with words II: Degrees of explicitness in think-aloud during the comprehension of literary and expository texts with different types of readers. Poetics, 18, 45-71.

Meutsch, D., & Schmidt, S. J. (1985). On the role of conventions in understanding literary text. Poetics, 14, 551-74.

Meutsch, D. and Viehoff, R., Eds. (1989). Comprehension of literary discourse: Results and problems of interdisciplinary approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Meutsch, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (1990). On the role of computer models and technology in literary and media studies. Poetics, 19, 1-12.

Meyszies, U. (1990). Understanding literary narrative texts: Outline for an interdisciplinary dialogue. Poetics, 19, 505-21.

Miall, D. S. (1985). The structure of response: A Repertory Grid study of a poem. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 254-268.

Miall, D. S. (1986). Authorizing the reader. English Quarterly, 19, 186-195.

Miall, D. S. (1988). Affect and narrative: A model of response to stories. Poetics, 17, 259-272.

Miall, D. S. (1988). The indeterminacy of literary texts: The view from the reader. Journal of Literary Semantics, 17, 155-171.

Miall, D. S. (1989). Welcome the crisis! Rethinking learning methods in English studies. Studies in Higher Education, 14, 69-81.

Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55-78.

Miall, D. S. (1990). Readers' responses to narrative: Evaluating, relating, anticipating. Poetics, 19, 323-339.

Miall, D. S. (1990). An expert system approach to interpretation in literary response.  In R. Ennals and J-P. Gardin (Eds.), Interpretation in the humanities: Perspectives from artificial intelligence (pp. 196-214).  London: British Library.

Miall, D. S. (1992). Response to poetry: Studies of language and structure. In E. F. Nardocchio (Ed.), Reader response: The empirical dimension (pp. 153-170).  Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Miall, D. S. (1993). Constructing understanding: Emotion and literary response. In S. B. Straw & D. Bogdan (Eds.), Constructive reading: Teaching beyond communication (pp. 63-81). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

Miall, D. S. (1993). Beyond the word: Reading and the computer. In G. P. Landow and P. Delany (Eds.), The digital word: Text-based computing in the humanities (pp. 319-342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Miall, D. S. (1994). Beyond cognitivism: Studying readers. Stanford Humanities Review, suppl. 4, 82-84.

Miall, D. S. (1995). Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23, 275-298.

Miall, D. S. (1996). Empowering the reader: Literary response and classroom learning. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 463-478). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Miall, D. S. (2000). On the necessity of empirical studies of literary reading. Frame, 14, 43-59.

Miall, D. S. (2001). Sounds of contrast: An empirical approach to phonemic iconicity. Poetics, 29, 55-70.

Miall, D. S. (2001). An evolutionary framework for literary reading. In Gerard Steen & Dick Schram (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature: In honour of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 407-419). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Miall, D. S. (2003). Reading hypertext: Theoretical ambitions and empirical studies. Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie, 5, 161-179.

Miall, D. S. (2003). Literary discourse. In Arthur C. Graesser, Morton Ann Gernsbacher, & Susan R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 321-355). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Miall, D. S. (2004). Episode structures in literary narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics, 33, 111-129.

Miall, D. S. (2005). Beyond interpretation: The cognitive significance of reading. In B. Pettersson, H. Veivo, & M. Polvinen (Eds.), Cognition and literary interpretation in practice (pp. 129-156). Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.

Miall, D. S. (2006). Experimental approaches to reader responses to literature. In P. Locher, C. Martindale, & L. Dorfman (Eds.), New directions in aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (pp. 175-188). Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.

Miall, D. S. (2006). Literary reading: Empirical and theoretical studies. New York: Peter Lang.

Miall, D. S., & Dissanayake, E. (2003). The poetics of babytalk. Human Nature, 14, 337-364.

Miall, D. S., & Dobson, T. (2001). Reading hypertext and the experience of literature. Journal of Digital Information, 2.1.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes, 17, 337-352.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389-407.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37-58.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Feeling and the three phases of literary response. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth Biannual Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 282-290). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1998). The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327-341.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28, 121-138.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2001). Shifting perspectives: Readers' feelings and literary response. In Willie van Peer and Seymour Chatman (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp. 289-301). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30, 221-241.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). The effects of local phonetic contrasts in readers' responses to a short story. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 157-175.

Miesen, H. W. J. M. (2003). Predicting and explaining literary reading: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Poetics, 31, 189-212.

Millis, K. K. (1995). Encoding discourse perspective during the reading of a literary text. Poetics, 23, 235-53.

Mishra, P. & Brewer, W. F. (2003). Theories as a form of mental representation and their role in the recall of text information. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 277-303.

Morra, S., & Lazzarini, S. (2002). A cross-cultural study of response to Icelandic and Italian folktales. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 61-82.

Morrow, D. (1994). Spatial models created from text. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic Text Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 165-187.

Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 292-312.

Nardocchio, E., Ed. (1992). Reader response to literature: The empirical dimension. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Nemesio, A. (2001). Textual typology: A study of textual beginnings. Paschi, 2, 101-115.

Nemesio, A. (Ed.) (2001). Art, literature, and the empirical paradigm. CLCWeb III: 3, West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

Nemesio, A. (2002). The concretization of character in narrative texts. In Proceedings of the 17th congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 537-540). Osaka: IAEA Organizing Committee.

Nemesio, A., & Levorato, M. C. (2005). Readers' responses while reading a narrative text. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33, 19-31.

Nierlich, E. (1989). Fundamental demands on the construction of a theoretical object of strictly scientific Empirical Studies of Literature. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 131-44.

Nierlich, E. (2005). An 'empirical science' of literature. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 36, 351-376.

Oatley, K. (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23, 53-74.

Oatley, K. (1999). Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics, 26, 439-454.

Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3, 101-117.

Oatley, K. (2001). Shakespeare's invention of theatre as simulation that runs on minds. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 27-45.

Oatley, K. (2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Oatley, K. (2003). Emotional expression and experience in the visual and narrative arts. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of the affective sciences (pp. 481-502). New York: Oxford University Press.

Oatley, K. (2003). Writingandreading: The future of cognitive poetics. In J. Gavins, & G. Steen, (Eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice (pp 161-173). London: Routledge.

Oatley, K. (2004). From the emotions of conversation to the passions of fiction. In: A. Manstead, N. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium. (pp. 98-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Oatley, K. (2004). Scripts, transformations, and suggestiveness of emotions in Shakespeare and Chekhov. Review of General Psychology, 8, 323-340

Oatley, K., & Cholamain, M. (1997). Emotions and identification: Connections between readers and fiction. In Hort, M, & Laver, S. (Eds), Emotion and the arts (pp. 215-224). New York: Oxford University Press.

Oatley, K. & Djikic, M. (2002). Emotions and transformation: Varieties of experience of identity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9-10, 97-116.

Oatley, K., & Kerr, A. (1999). Memories prompted by emotions -- Emotions attached to memories: Studies of depression and of reading fiction. Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 27, 657-669.

Oatley, K., & Mar, R. A. (2005). Evolutionary pre-adaptation and the idea of character in fiction. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 179-194

Odorics, F. (1989). Towards the constructivist science of literature (a new paradigm?). Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 145-61.

Olson, G. M., Mack, R. L, & Duffy, S. A. (1981). Cognitive aspects of genre. Poetics, 10, 283-315.

Otero, J., Leon, J. A., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.) (2002). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Paivio, A. (1983). The mind's eye in arts and science. Poetics, 12, 1-18.

Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1993). Making sense of emotion in stories and social life. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 295-323.

Perry, M. (1979). Literary dynamics: How the order of a text creates its meanings. Poetics Today, 1, 35-64.

Person, R. F., Jr. (1996). In Conversation with Jonah: Conversation Analysis, Literary Criticism, and the Book of Jonah. JSOTSup 220. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Person, R. F., Jr. (1999). Structure and Meaning in Conversation and Literature. Lanham: University Press of America.

Petros, T. V., Bentz, B., Hammes, K., & Zehr, H. D. (1990). The components of text that influence reading times and recall in skilled and less skilled college readers. Discourse Processes, 13, 387-400.

Petrov, V. (1994). Perception of prose: a struggle with the matter of the texts (a trial of an empirical investigation). SPIEL, 13, 22-45.

Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 29, 201-222.

Pfeiffer, K. L. (1983). Interpretation: anthropology and the ecology of mind. Poetics, 12, 165-83.

Pilkington, A. (1991). The literary reading process: a relevance theory perspective. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 117-23). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Polichak, J. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). "Get up and win!": Participatory responses to narrative. In: M. C. Greene, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. (pp. 71-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pollard-Gott, L., McCloskey, M., & Todes, A. K. (1979). Subjective story structure. Discourse Processes, 2, 251-281.

Polya, T., László, J., & Forgas, J. P. (2005). Making sense of life stories: The role of narrative perspective in perceiving hidden information about social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 785-796.

Potter, R. G. (1992). Reader response to dialogue. In E. F. Nardocchio (Ed.), Reader response: The empirical dimension (pp. 15-33). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Purves, A. C., & Beach, R. (1972). Studies of response to literature. Literature and the reader. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English..

Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). A novel study: Investigating the structure of narrative and autobiographical memories. Memory, 13, 796-814.

Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Readers' reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 30, 779-788.

Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2006). Predilections for narrative outcomes: The impact of story contexts and reader preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 54-67.

Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers' trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 737-750.

Ravid, D., & Hanauer, D. (1998). A prototype theory of rhyme. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 79-106.

Razavi, D., Delvaux, N., Marchal, S., Durieux, J.-F., Farvacques, C., Dubus, L., & Hogenraad, R. (2002). Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomized study. British Journal of Cancer, 87, 1-7.

Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical criticism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary work. Carbondale, London & Amsterdam: Southern Illinois University Press.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory into Practice, 21, 268-277.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as exploration, 5th ed. New York: Modern Language Association of America.

Rossen-Knill, D. F. (1994). Toward a pragmatics for literary interpretation. Poetics, 22, 423-445.

Rusch, G., Ed. (1995).  Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL (Budapest, August 1994). Siegen: Siegen University LUMIS-Publications.

Ryan, M.-L. (1992). The modes of narrativity and their visual metaphors. Style, 26, 368-387.

Ryan, M.-L. (1994). Immersion vs. interactivity: Virtual reality and literary theory. Postmodern Culture, 5.

Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 221-238.

Sadoski, M, and Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 256-272.

Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Kangiser, S. (1988). Imagination in story response: Relationships between imagery, affect, and structural importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 320-336.

Sadoksi, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 85-95.

Sadoksi, M., Goetz, E. T., Stricker, A. G., & Burdenski, T. K., Jr. (2003). New findings for concreteness and imagery effects in written composition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 443-453.

Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Eerlbaum.

Sadoksi, M., Willson, V. L., Holcomb, A., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2004). Verbal and nonverbal predictors of spelling performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 461-478.

Sanders, J., & Redeker, G. (1993). Linguistic perspective in short news stories. Poetics, 22, 69-87.

Schmidt, S. J. (1980). Fictionality in literary and non-literary discourse. Poetics, 9, 525-546.

Schmidt, S. J. (1981). Empirical studies in literature: Introductory remarks. Poetics, 10, 317-336.

Schmidt, S. J. (1982). Foundations for the empirical study of literature, trans. R. de Beaugrande. Hamburg, Buske.

Schmidt, S. J. (1983). The empirical science of literature ESL: A new paradigm. Poetics, 12, 19-34.

Schmidt, S. J. (1990). What advertising can tell scholars of empirical aesthetics. Poetics, 19, 389-404.

Schmidt, S. J. (1991). Text understanding -- A self-organizing cognitive process. Poetics, 20, 273-301.

Schmidt, S. J. (1991). Empirical studies in literature and the media: Perspectives for the nineties. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 9-17). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Schmidt, S. J. (1991). Literary systems as self-organizing systems. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 413-424). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Schmidt, S. J. (1996). Media: The coupling of cognition and communication. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 35-49). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Schmidt, S. J. (2000). Interpretation: The story does have an ending. Poetics Today, 21, 621-632.

Schmidt, S. J. (2000). The empirical study of literature (ESL). In D. De Geest, O. De Graef, D. Delabastita, K. Geldof, R. Ghesquière, & J. Lambert (Eds.), Under construction: Links for the site of literary theory: Essays in honour of Hendrik Van Gorp (pp 325-349) . Louvain: Leuven University Press.

Schmidt, S. J. (2001). Media societies: Fiction machines. In C. B. Grant & D. McLaughlin (Eds.), Critical studies: Language - meaning - social construction (pp. 11-25). Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.

Schmidt, S. J., & Groeben, N. (1989). How to do thoughts with words: On understanding literature. In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of literary discourse (pp. 16-46). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Schram, D., & Steen, G. J., Eds. (2001). The psychology and sociology of literature. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Seamon, R. (1996). Guided rapid unconscious reconfiguration in poetry and art. Philosophy and Literature, 20, 412-427.

Seifert, C. M., Dyer, M. G., & Black, J. B. (1986). Thematic knowledge in story understanding. Text, 6, 393-426.

Seilman, U. & Larsen, S. F. (1989). Personal resonance to literature: A study of remindings while reading. Poetics, 18, 165-177.

Semino, E. (1997). Language and world creation in poems and other texts. London: Longman.

Shavit, Z. (1991). Canonicity and literary institutions. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 231-238). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Shen, Y. (2002). Cognitive constraints on verbal creativity: The use of figurative language in poetic discourse. In E. Semino, J. Culpeper, & D. C. Freeman, (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 211-230). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Shen, Y. (2002). Evaluation devices as a coordinating mechanism for story points. In M. Louwerse, & W. van Peer, (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp 77-90). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Shen, Y., & Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphorical (in)coherence in discourse. Discourse Processes, 28, 139-153.

Sotirova, V. (2006). Reader responses to narrative point of view. Poetics, 34, 108-133.

Spiro, R. (1982). Long-term comprehension: Schema-based versus experiential and evaluative understanding. Poetics, 11, 77-86.

Spiro, R. J., Crismore, A., & Turner, T. (1982). On the role of pervasive experiential coloration in memory. Text, 2, 253-262.

Stanners, R. F., Price, J. M., & Painton, S. (1982). Interrelationships among elements in fictional prose. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 95-107.

Steen, G. J. (1991). The empirical study of literary reading: Methods of data collection. Poetics, 20, 559-575.

Steen, G. J. (1994). Understanding metaphor in literature. London: Longman.

Steen, G. J. (1999). Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes, 28, 109-120.

Steen, G. J. (2000). Language, text and discourse: Robert Browning's 'Meeting at Night' and 'Parting at Morning.' In T. Bex, M. Burke, P. Stockwell, O. Fischer, K. Wales, R. Carter (Eds.), Contextualizing stylistics: In honour of Peter Verdonk (pp. 195-207). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Steen, G. J. (2001). A rhetoric of metaphor: Conceptual and linguistic metaphor and the psychology of literature. In D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp 145-163). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Steen, G. J. (2002). Metaphor identification: A cognitive approach. Style, 36, 386-407.

Steen, G. J. (2002). Metaphor in Bob Dylan's 'Hurricane': Genre, language, and style. In E. Semino & J. Culpepper (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 183-210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Steen, G. J. (2002). Poetics and linguistics again: the role of genre. In S. Csabi & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Textual secrets: the message of the medium (pp. 42-51). Budapest: School of English and American Studies, Eotvos Lorand University Budapest.

Steen, G. J. (2003). A historical view of empirical poetics: Trends and possibilities. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 21, 51-67.

Steen, G. J. (2003). 'Love stories': Cognitive scenarios in love poetry. In J. Gavins & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge.

Steen, G. J. (2004). Questions about metaphor in literature. European Journal of English Studies, 8, 337-354.

Steen, G. J. (Ed.) (2004). Journal of Pragmatics: An International Journal of Language Studies, 36, 1183-1313. (Special issue).

Steen, G. J. (2004). Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1295-1313.

Steen, G. J. (2004). Perspectives on discourse: The state of the art. Language and Literature, 13, 161-179.

Steen, G. J., & Gavins, J. (2003). Contextualizing cognitive poetics. In J. Gavins & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice (pp. 1-16). London: Routledge.

Steen, G. J., & Schram D. H. (1996). Literary aspects of reading and thinking out loud. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 329-338). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Steen, G. J., & Schram, D. H. (eds.) (2001). The psychology and sociology of literature: In honour of Elrud Ibsch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Stephenson, W. (1972). Applications of communication theory: II -- Interpretations of Keats' 'Ode on a Grecian Urn.' Psychological Record, 22, 177-192.

Stewart, L. (2005). Empirical analysis, gender assumptions, and the language of narration in eighteenth-century fiction. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 65-77.

Stokmans, M. J. W. (1999). Reading attitude and its effect on leisure time reading. Poetics, 26, 245-261.

Stokmans, M. J. W. (2003). How heterogeneity in cultural tastes is captured by psychological factors: a study of reading fiction. Poetics, 31, 423-439.

Suleiman, S. R., and Crosman, I., Eds. (1980). The reader in the text: Essays in audience and interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sundermeier, B. A., Van den Broek, P., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Causal coherence and the availability of locations and objects during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 33, 462-470.

Sweet A. P., & Anderson J. I., Eds. (1993). Reading research into the year 2000. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Thury, E. M., & Friedlander, A. (1996). Factors in transactions with literature: An analysis of student response journals. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 419-444). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Tompkins, J. P., Ed. (1980). Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism. Baltimore & London: John Hopkins University Press.

Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. (1994). Toward a theory of cumulative canon formation: Readership in English Canada. Mosaic, 27, 107-119.

Tötösy de Zepetnek, S.  & Kreisel, P. (1992). Urban English-speaking Canadian literary readership: Results of a pilot study. Poetics, 21, 211-238.

Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.

Tsur, R. (1979). Levels of information processing in reading poetry. Critical Inquiry, 5, 751-759.

Tsur, R. (1992). What Makes Sound Patterns Expressive: The poetic mode of speech-perception. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Tsur, R. (1995). Semantic processes and emotional qualities in poetry. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 265-271). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Tsur, R. (1996). Rhyme and cognitive poetics. Poetics Today, 17, 55-87.

Tsur, R. (1997). Poetic rhythm: Performance patterns and their acoustic correlates. Versification: An Electronic Journal Devoted to Poetic Prosody, 1 <http://sizcol1.u-shizuoka-ken.ac.jp/versif/PoeticRhythm_PerformancePats.html>

Tsur, R. (1997). Sound affects of poetry -- critical impressionism, reductionism, and cognitive poetics. Pragmatics and Cognition, 5, 283-304.

Tsur, R. (1998). Poetic rhythm: Structure and performance -- An empirical study in cognitive poetics. Bern: Peter Lang.

Tsur, R. (2000). Metaphor and figure-ground relationship: Comparisons from poetry, music, and the visual arts. PSYART: A Hyperlink Journal for the Psychological Study of the Arts, 4, n.p.

Tsur, R. (2000). Phonetic cues and dramatic function: Artistic recitation of metered speech. Assaph: Studies in the Theatre, 16, 173-196.

Tsur, R. (2000). Picture poetry, mannerism, and sign relationships. Poetics Today, 21, 751-781.

Tsur, R. (2002). Aspects of cognitive poetics. In E. Semino, J. Culpeper, & D. C. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 279-318). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tsur, R. (2002). Some cognitive foundations of 'cultural programs.' Poetics Today, 23, 63-89.

Tsur, R. (2003). Deixis and abstractions: Adventures in space and time. In J. Gavins, & G. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice (pp. 41-54). London: Routledge.

Tsur, R. (2003). The demonic and the grotesque. In M. Stern, & R. B. Marchesani (Eds.), Inhabitants of the unconscious: The grotesque and the vulgar in everyday life. (pp. 111-126). New York: Haworth Press.

Tsur, R. (2004). Some mannerist ingenuities in mystic poetry. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, 60-78.

Tsur, R. (2006). 'Kubla Khan' -- poetic structure, hypnotic quality and cognitive style: A study in mental, vocal and critical performance. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tsur, R., & Benari, M. (2001). "Composition of place", experiential set, and the meditative poem: A cognitive-pragmatic approach. Pragmatics & Cognition, 9, 203-237.

Tsur, R., & Benari, M. (2003). On the shore of nothingness: Space, rhythm, and semantic structure in religious poetry and its mystic-secular counterpart: A study in cognitive poetics. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

Tsur, R., Glicksohn, J., & Goodblatt, C. (1991). Gestalt qualities in poetry and the reader's absorption style. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 487-500.

Twilley, L. C., & Dixon, P. (2000). Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 49-82.

Van Assche, A. (1991). Content-analysis and 'experimental' methods in literary study: Scientific twins or opponents? In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature (pp. 347-53). Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J. et al. (2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In: S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment. (pp. 107-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Van den Broek, P., Rohleder, L., & Narváez, D. (1996). Causal inferences in the comprehension of literary texts. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 179-200). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Van Dijk, N. (1997). Attention for literature now and in future. SPIEL, 16 (1-2), 343-347.

Van Dijk, N. (1997). Menno ter Braak in Dutch literature: Object and subject of image-building. In N. J. Fenoulhet and L. Gilbert (Eds.), Presenting the past: history, art, language, literature. Crossways Series, Vol. 3. (pp. 306-315). London: Centre for Low Countries Studies.

Van Dijk, N. (1999). Neither the top nor the literary fringe: The careers and reputations of middle group authors. Poetics, 26, 405-421.

Van Dijk, N. (1999). Research into canon formation: Nationalism, literature and an institutional point of view. Poetics Today, 20 (1), 121-132.

Van Dijk, N. (2001). Critical support, interviews, and sidelines. Institutional factors that contribute to success in the art world. In K. Ernst, M. E. Halbertsma, T. Ijdens, M. S. S. E. Janssen & T. Ijdens (eds.), Trends and strategies in the art and cultural industries (pp. 331-340). Rotterdam: Barhesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn & Co's.

Van Dijk, N. & Vermunt, J. K. (1997). Literary careers and critical reputation: A longitudinal study. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek & I. Sywenky (Eds.), The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application.  (pp. 255-265). Edmonton & Siegen: University of Alberta: RICL-CCS and Siegen University: LUMIS.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 8, 569-575.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Cognitive processing of literary discourse. Poetics Today, 1, 143-159.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Story comprehension: an introduction. Poetics, 9, 1-22.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Discourse, ideology and context. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae, 35, 11-40.

Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.

Van Peer, W. (1987). Top-down and bottom-up: interpretative strategies in reading E. E. Cummings. New Literary History, 18, 597-610.

Van Peer, W. (1987). Empirical studies and their relationship to the theory of literature. SPIEL, 6, 145-62.

Van Peer, W. (1988). Story, structure and strategy: Narratives and their educational value. Parlance, 1, 223-234.

Van Peer, W. (1990). The measurement of metre. Poetics, 19, 259-275.

Van Peer, W. (1991). Literary socialization in the family: A state of the art. Poetics, 20, 539-58.

Van Peer, W. (1992). Literary studies and the question of definition. SPIEL, 11, 191-96.

Van Peer, W. (1992). Definition of art. SPIEL, 11, 269-77.

Van Peer, W. (1992). Literary theory and reader response. In E. F. Nardocchio (Ed.), Reader response: The empirical dimension (pp. 137-152).  Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Van Peer, W. (1995). The empirical study of (literary) texts. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 313-318). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Van Peer, W. (1997). Toward a poetics of emotion. In M. Hort & S. Laver (Eds), Emotion and the arts (pp. 215-224). New York: Oxford University Press.

Van Peer, W. (1997). 'High'/'low' cultural products and their social functions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15, 29-39.

Van Peer, W. (1997). The empirical study of literary evaluation. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek and I. Sywenky (Eds.), The systemic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application. University of Alberta: RICL-CCS and Siegen University: LUMIS, 1997.

Van Peer, W. (1998). Sense and nonsense of chaos theory in literary studies. In E. S. Schaffer (Ed.), The third culture: Literature and science (pp. 40-48). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Van Peer, W. (2000). Hidden meanings. In T. Bex, M. Burke, P. Stockwell, O. Fischer, K. Wales, & R. Carter (Eds.), Contextualized stylistics: In honour of Peter Verdonk (pp. 39-47). Amsterdam: Rodolpi.

Van Peer, W. (2002). On the origins of style. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31, 1-18.

Van Peer, W. (2002). Where do literary themes come from? In M. Louwerse, & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 253-263). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Van Peer, W., & Chatman, S., Eds. (2001). New perspectives on narrative perspective. New York: State University of New York Press.

Van Peer, W., & Graf, E. (2002). Between the lines: Spatial language and its developmental representation in Stephen King's IT. In E. Semino, J. Culpeper, & D. C. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 123-152). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Van Peer, W., & Pander Maat, H. (1996). Perspectivation and sympathy: Effects of narrative point of view. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 3-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Van Peer, W., & Pander Maat, H. (2001). Narrative perspective and the interpretation of characters' motives. Language and Literature, 10, 229-241.

Van Rees, K., Larsen, S. F., & Viehoff, R., Eds. (1996). Special issue: Expert and novice readers. Poetics, 23 (whole no. 6).

Van Rees, K., & Verdaasdonk, H. (1996). An interdisciplinary view of cultural behavior. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 659-678). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Van Rees, K., & Vipond, D. (Eds.) (2003). Poetics, 31, 151-300. (Special issue).

Van Schooten, E., Oostdam, R., de Glopper, K. (2001). Dimensions and Predictors of Literary Response. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 1-31.

Van Schooten, E. & de Glopper, K. (2002). The relation between attitude toward reading adolescent literature and literary reading behaviour. Poetics, 30, 169-194.

Van Schooten, E. & de Glopper, K. (2003). The development of literary response in secondary education. Poetics, 31, 155-187.

Van Schooten, E., de Glopper, K. & Stoel, R. D. (2004). Development of attitude toward reading adolescent literature and literary reading behavior. Poetics, 32, 343-386.

Verboord, M. (2003). Classification of authors by literary prestige. Poetics, 31, 259-281.

Verboord, M. (2005). Long-term effects of literary education on book-reading frequency: An analysis of Dutch student cohorts 1975–1998. Poetics, 33, 320-342.

Verboord, M. and Van Rees, K. (2003). Do changes in socialization lead to decline in reading level? How parents, literary education, and popular culture affect the level of books read. Poetics, 31, 283-300.

Verdaasdonk, H. (1982). Conceptions of literature as frames? Poetics, 11, 87-104.

Versaasdonk, H., & Van Rees, K. (1992). The narrow margins of innovation in literary research: Siegfried J. Schmidt's proposals for empirical study of literature. Poetics, 21, 141-152.

Viehoff, R. (1986). How to construct a literary poem? Poetics, 15, 287-306.

Viehoff, R. (1995). Literary genres as cognitive schemata. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the fourth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature-IGEL, Budapest, August 1994 (pp. 72-76). Siegen: LUMIS-Publications.

Viehoff, R., & Andringa, E. (1990). Literary understanding as interaction: Some aspects, some hints, some problems. Poetics, 19, 221-230.

Viehoff, R., & Meutsch, D. (1989). Interdisciplinarity in the empirical study of literature -- introductory remarks to 'Comprehension of literary discourse.' In D. Meutsch, & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of literary discourse (pp. 1-15). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Vipond, D., & Hunt, R. A. (1984). Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of of literary reading. Poetics, 13, 261-277.

Vipond, D., & Hunt, R. A. (1987). Shunting information or making contact?: Assumptions for research on aesthetic reading. English Quarterly, 20, 131-136.

Vipond, D., & Hunt, R. A. (1989). Literary processing and response as transaction: Evidence for the contribution of readers, texts, and situations. In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of literary discourse: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 155-174). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Vipond, D., Hunt, R.A., & Wheeler, L. C. (1987). Social reading and literary engagement. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 151-161.

Whissell, C. (2000). Phonoemotional profiling: A description of the emotional flavour of English texts on the basis of the phonemes employed in them. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 617-648.

Whissell, C. (2000). Emotion and closure in the sound expressiveness of quatrains from Fitgerald's Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 135-149.

Whissell, C. (2001). The emotionality of William Blake's poems: A quantitative comparison of Songs of Innocence with Songs of Experience. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 459-467.

Whissell, C. (2002). Emotion conveyed by sound in the poetry of Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 137-155.

Whissell, C. (2003). Pronounceability: A measure of language samples based on children's mastery of the phonemes employed in them. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 748-754.

Whissell, C. (2003). Readers' opinions of romantic poetry are consistent with emotional measures based on the Dictionary of Affect in Language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 990-992.

Whissell, C. (2004). Emotion and style in an English translation of the Quran. Psychological Reports, 94, 523-544.

Whissell, C. (2004). "The sound must seem an echo to the sense": Pope's use of sound to convey meaning in his translation of Homer's Iliad. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 859-864

Whissell, C. (2004). Using computer-scored measures of emotion and style to discriminate among disputed and undisputed Pauline and Non-Pauline epistles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1117-1125.

Whissell, C. (2006). Comparison of the books of the New Testament (English translation) in terms of emotion and word use. Psychological Reports, 98, 57-64.

Wilensky, R. (1983). Story grammars versus story points. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 579-623.

Wimsatt, W. K., & Beardsley, M. (1954). The affective fallacy. In W. Wimsatt, The verbal icon (pp. 21-39). London: Methuen. (Original work published 1946).

Yekovitch, F. R., & Thorndyke, P. W. (1981). An evaluation of alternative functional models of narrative schemata. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 454-469.

Yaron, I. (2002). Processing of obscure poetic texts: Mechanisms of selection. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31, 133–170.

Zaharias, J. A., & Mertz, M. P. (1983). Identifying and validating the constituents of literary response through a modification of the response preference measure. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 231-241.

Zajonc, R. B., Murphy, S. I., & McIntosh, D. N. (1993). Brain temperature and subjective emotional experience. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 209-220). New York: Guildford Press.

Zeitz, Colleen M. (1994). Expert-novice difference in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 277-312.

Zill, N., & Winglee, M. (1990). Who reads literature? The future of the United States as a nation of readers. Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press.

Zöllner, K. (1990). 'Quotation analysis' as a means of understanding comprehension processes of longer and more difficult texts. Poetics, 19, 293-322.

Zwaan, R. A. (1991). Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139-156.

Zwaan, R. A. (1991). The literary situation-action model the reading process. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen, G. (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-Conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 167-174). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.

Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196-1207.

Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Toward a model of literary comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 241-255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zwaan, R. A. (1996). How empirical is the Empirical Study of Literature? In H. Hendrix, J. Kloek, S. Levie, & W. van Peer (Eds.), The search for a new alphabet: Literary studies in a changing world; in honour of Douwe Fokkema (pp. 321-326). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81-88.

Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 15-18.

Zwaan, R. A. (2002). An experimental view of language comprehension: Some implications for document design. Document Design: Journal of Research and Problem Solving in Organizational Communication, 3, 54-64.

Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 44. (pp. 35-62). New York: Elsevier Science.

Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.

Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., & Whitten, S. N. (2000). The presence of an event in the narrated situation affects its availability to the comprehender. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1022-1028.

Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.

Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., & Whitten, S. N. (2002). Situtation models and themes. In M. Louwerse, & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 35-53). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes. (pp. 83-121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H.  (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 125-143.

Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1994). Spatial information and naturalistic story comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp and R.A. Zwaan (Eds.) Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 97-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Document created: Wednesday, May 6th, 1998 / last revised November 25th 2007