J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci (www.cspscanada.org) 8(3):400-408, 2005
Disodium Ascorbyl Phytostanyl Phosphates (FM-VP4) reduces plasma
cholesterol concentration, body weight and abdominal fat gain within a
dietary-induced obese mouse model
Norbert
A. Looije1, Verica Risovic1, David J. Stewart2,
Daniel Debeyer2, James Kutney2 and Kishor M. Wasan1*
1Division of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics,
Faculty of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada
&
2Forbes Medi-Tech Inc, Vancouver B.C., Canada
Received March 19, 2005,Revised June 15, 2005, Accepted August 15, 2005, Published August 24, 2005
Corresponding Author:
Kishor M. Wasan, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to
determine if Disodium Ascorbyl Phytostanol Phosphates (FM-VP4) alters animal body
weight and plasma lipid levels in a dietary-induced obese mouse model. Methods: Twenty-four C57BL6 mice (28
days old) were housed individually and fed a standard mouse diet for 2 weeks
upon arrival. After 2 weeks the animals were weighed and divided in 4 groups of
similar average weight, and the groups received a low fat (10% kcal from fat)
and high fat (45% kcal from fat) diet with or without FM-VP4 (2% w/w) for 12
continuous weeks. Food, water and caloric intake and body weight were recorded
on a daily basis throughout the duration of the study. Following the 12th week of the
study all animals were humanely sacrificed and blood and abdominal fat pads were
harvested for further analysis. Plasma cholesterol, triglyceride, AST/ALT and
creatinine levels were measured using enzymatic
kits. Results: There is a
significant difference in weight gain between the low-fat diet and the low-fat diet
+ 2% w/w FM-VP4 treatment groups (P<0.05), as well as between the high-fat
diet and the high-fat diet + 2% w/w FM-VP4 treatment groups (P<0.05).
However, the reduction of weight gain of the high-fat diet + 2% FM-VP4 treatment
group compared to the high-fat group was 51%, while the reduction in weight
gain between the low-fat diet + 2% w/w FM-VP4 treatment group and the low-fat
diet group was 17% over the duration of the study. No significant differences
in food and water intakes, serum creatinine and AST/ALT levels were observed
between the four groups. No significant differences in caloric intake between
the low-fat diet and the low-fat diet + 2% w/w FM-VP4. However, a significant
difference in caloric intake between high-fat diet and the high-fat diet + 2%
w/w FM-VP4 treatment groups was observed. In addition, significant reductions
in plasma cholesterol levels and abdominal fat pad weight between diet alone and
diet + FM-VP4 treatment groups were observed. Conclusions:
These findings suggest that FM-VP4 may have potential weight-loss and cholesterol
lowering activity in both High Fat and Low Fat Diets treated groups.
INTRODUCTION
The
obesity epidemic has been recognized by the World Health Organization as one of
the top 10 global health problems (1). Worldwide, more than one billion adults
are overweight and over 300 million are obese (1). Most countries are experiencing dramatic
increases in obesity.
Obesity
is a condition associated with the accumulation of excessive body fat resulting
from chronic imbalance of energy whereby the intake of energy exceeds
expenditure. The excess body fat predisposes an obese individual to chronic
diseases, such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, diseases of the gall
bladder and cancer (2, 3). The high incidence of obesity, its multifactorial
nature and the scarcity of adequate therapeutics have fuelled an increase in
anti-obesity drug-related research. Although a number of pharmacological approaches
have been investigated in recent years, few therapeutically effective products
have been developed (2).
Our laboratory has been investigating the
lipid lowering and anti-atherosclerotic effects of a novel cholesterol
absorption inhibitor, FM-VP4 (disodium ascorbyl phytostanyl phosphates, FM-VP4, Figure 1), in several animal models (4-9).
In several of these studies, we noted that FM-VP4 administration caused a
decrease in body weight without any observable liver or
kidney toxicity or changes
in food
or water intake (7, 8). Although several studies have described the effects of
plant sterols/stanols on significantly decreasing total plasma and lipoprotein
cholesterol levels between 10-20% at doses between 1-5 g/day (10-24), there is
no evidence for any weight loss properties. Therefore, our observation of
non-toxic weight loss appears to be specific for FM-VP4. However, to date,
weight loss studies with FM-VP4 have not been conducted in a dietary-induced
obese animal model. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if
disodium ascorbyl phytostanol phosphates (FM-VP4) alters animal body weight and
plasma lipid levels in a dietary-induced obese mouse model receiving a low-(10% kcal from fat) and high-fat diet
(45% kcal from fat).
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Chemicals
Disodium
ascorbyl phytostanyl phosphates (FM-VP4;
Dietary-Induced Obese Mouse
Model
Four-week-old male C57BL6 mice were
purchased from Charles River Laboratories,
Experimental design
Twenty-four C57BL6 mice (4 weeks old) were obtained from Charles River
Laboratories (
Food, water and caloric intakes (calculated based on the amount of food
consumed daily and the nutritional information provided in table 1) intakes and
body weight were recorded for all animals on a daily basis. Following the 12th
week of the study animals were humanely sacrificed using a CO2
chamber and blood and abdominal fat pads were harvested for further analysis.
Plasma cholesterol, triglyceride, serum creatinine and AST/ALT levels were
determined using enzymatic kits
(Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) as previously described (7,8)
Diet Preparation and Animal Care
Diet preparation was carried
out at Research Diets (Table 1) and FM-VP4 was incorporated into the diet as
previously published (5,7,8). The Animal
Care Committee of the
Collection of blood and harvesting of abdominal fat
pads
At
the end of the study mice were sacrificed using CO2 gas and blood
was taken from the right ventricle.
Blood cells were pelleted by centrifugation and plasma was
harvested. Abdominal fat pads were
removed from the abdomen of each mouse and weighed. The abdominal fat pads (this is the fat from
the dorsal abdomen region of the mouse) were removed by a member of the animal care unit at UBC who was
blinded to the dose group of each individual mouse and used the dissection
technique from the work of Henry et al.
(26).
Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as mean ± SD (standard
deviation). Statistical analysis were conducted using an analysis of variance
(PCANOVA; Human Dynamic Systems) and assuming unequal variance (Newman Keuls
post-hoc test) was used to assess the differences between the FM-VP4 treatment
groups and the untreated control group for body weight, abdominal fat
weight, plasma lipids, food, water and
Figure
1. Chemical Structure of
Disodium Ascorbyl Phytostanyl Phosphates (FM-VP4)
Table 1: The
Composition of the Low Fat; High Fat; Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 and High Fat
+ 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diets and their caloric content |
||||||||
Diet Ingredient |
Low Fat |
Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
High Fat |
High Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
||||
|
gm |
kcal |
gm |
kcal |
gm |
kcal |
gm |
kcal |
Casein, 80 Mesh |
200 |
800 |
200 |
800 |
200 |
800 |
200 |
800 |
L-Cystein |
3 |
12 |
3 |
12 |
3 |
12 |
3 |
12 |
Corn Starch |
315 |
1260 |
315 |
1260 |
72.8 |
291 |
72.8 |
291 |
Maltodextrin 10 |
35 |
140 |
35 |
140 |
100 |
400 |
100 |
400 |
Sucrose |
350 |
1400 |
350 |
1400 |
172.8 |
691.2 |
172.8 |
691.2 |
Cellulose, BW200 |
50 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
Soybean Oil |
25 |
225 |
25 |
225 |
25 |
225 |
25 |
225 |
Lard |
20 |
180 |
20 |
180 |
177.5 |
1598 |
177.5 |
1597 |
Mineral mix, S10026 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
DiCalcium Phosphate |
13 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
Calcium Carbonate |
5.5 |
0 |
5.5 |
0 |
5.5 |
0 |
5.5 |
0 |
Potassium Citrate, 1H2O |
16.5 |
0 |
16.5 |
0 |
16.5 |
0 |
16.5 |
0 |
Vitamin mix, V10001 |
10 |
40 |
10 |
40 |
10 |
40 |
10 |
40 |
Choline Bitartrate |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
FM-VP4 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
FD&C Yellow Dye #5 |
0.05 |
0 |
0.025 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FD&C Red Dye #40 |
0 |
0 |
0.025 |
0 |
0.05 |
0 |
0.05 |
0 |
FD&C Blue Dye #1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL |
1055 |
4057 |
1075 |
4057 |
858 |
4057 |
878 |
4057 |
Diet |
Low Fat |
Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
High Fat |
High Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
||||
|
gm% |
kcal% |
gm% |
kcal% |
gm% |
kcal% |
gm% |
kcal% |
Protein |
19.2 |
20 |
18.9 |
20 |
23.7 |
20 |
23.1 |
20 |
Carbohydrate |
67.3 |
70 |
66 |
70 |
41.4 |
35.1 |
40.5 |
35.1 |
Fat |
4.3 |
10 |
4.2 |
10 |
23.6 |
44.9 |
23.1 |
44.9 |
TOTAL Kcal/gm |
3.85 |
100 |
3.77 |
100 |
4.73 |
100 |
4.62 |
100 |
Figure 2: Average weekly weight of male C57Bl6 mice on either Low Fat; High Fat; Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 or High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diet. Week 1 – 9, n=6; week 10 – 12, n=5.
RESULTS
Total body and abdominal fat pad weight
The weight gain of the four
groups is depicted in
Figure 2. This figure clearly shows that weight gain of
the High Fat group was higher throughout the entire duration of the experiment
compared to all the other groups while all groups started at the same average
weight, this finding is significant from week 2 until the end of the experiment
(p<0.05). Even though there was a significant difference in weight gain
between the Low Fat and the Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 groups (P<0.05), as
well as between the High Fat and the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 groups
(P<0.05), the difference in the weight gain between the High Fat and High
Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group was much more profound than between the Low Fat and
the Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group. The reduction of weight gain of the High
Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group compared to the High Fat group was 51%, while the
reduction in weight gain between the Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 and the Low Fat
group was 17%.
Both groups, which
have been fed the FM-VP4 enriched diets, followed a very similar weight pattern
throughout the entire experiment despite the difference in caloric content of
the diet, and there was no significant difference in average weight between the
two groups throughout the entire experiment.
The weight of the abdominal fat pads of the treatment groups is depicted in Figure 3. The weight of the abdominal fat pads of the High Fat group was increased by 115% compared to the Low Fat group as a result of the high fat content of their diet. The weight of the abdominal fat pads of the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group has decreased by 70% compared to the High Fat group and by 38% compared to the Low Fat group. The Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group compared to the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group did not significantly differ in weight of the fat pads, otherwise all differences between groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).
Figure
3: Weight of the
abdominal fat pads in grams of male C57Bl6 mice on either Low Fat; High Fat;
Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 or High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diet. a. P<0.05 vs.
Low Fat; b. P<0.05 vs. High Fat; c. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4; d.
P<0.05 vs. High Fat + 2% FM-VP4.
Food, caloric and water intake
The patterns of food intake
and of caloric intake of the four treatment groups are depicted in
Tables 2 and
3. Food and caloric intake were steady throughout the experiment for all
treatment groups. But even though it is not as evident from the data of the
food intake, the caloric intake of the High Fat group was slightly higher
compared to all other treatment groups throughout the duration of the study
(Table 3). In weeks 6 through 10 this difference in caloric intake is even
significant (p<0.05) compared to the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group that
has a similar caloric content per gram diet (Table 1). This was an unexpected
result since food with the same caloric content is expected to be eaten in
approximately the same amount by the animals.
Table 2: Average weekly food
intake in grams of male C57Bl6 mice on either Low Fat; High Fat; Low Fat + 2%
(w/w) FM-VP4 or High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diet. |
||||
Group / Week |
Low
Fat |
High
Fat |
Low
Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
High
Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
1 |
3.3 ± 0.5 |
3.5 ± 0.7 |
2.5 ± 0.8 |
2.6 ± 1.0 |
2 |
3.1 ± 0.6 |
3.0 ± 0.4 |
3.2 ± 0.4 |
3.1 ± 0.5 |
3 |
3.1 ± 0.3 |
2.8 ± 0.5 |
3.2 ± 0.2 |
2.9 ± 0.3 |
4 |
3.2 ± 0.3d |
3.0 ± 0.4 |
3.2 ± 0.2d |
3.7 ± 0.3a,c |
5 |
3.3 ± 0.4 d |
3.0 ± 0.3 |
3.2 ± 0.3 d |
2.7 ± 0.2a,c |
6 |
3.3 ± 0.4 |
3.2 ± 0.4 |
3.2 ± 0.3 |
2.8 ± 0.2 |
7 |
3.2 ± 0.4 d |
3.3 ± 0.3 d |
3.3 ± 0.2 d |
2.7 ± 0.2a,b,c |
8 |
3.0 ± 0.5 |
3.3 ± 0.4 d |
3.3 ± 0.2 d |
2.7 ± 0.2b,c |
9 |
3.1 ± 0.4 d |
3.2 ± 0.3 d |
3.2 ± 0.2 d |
2.7 ± 0.2a,b,c |
10 |
3.3 ± 0.5 |
3.5 ± 0.3 |
3.2 ± 0.3 |
2.9 ± 0.2 |
11 |
3.4 ± 0.5 |
3.3 ± 0.5 |
3.2 ± 0.5 |
3.0 ± 0.5 |
12 |
3.2 ± 0.5 |
3.1 ± 0.3 |
3.2 ± 0.3 |
2.8 ± 0.3 |
a. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat; b. P<0.05 vs. High Fat;
c. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4; d. P<0.05 vs. High Fat + 2% FM-VP4. Average weekly food intake is given in
grams. |
Table 3: Average weekly caloric intake in kilocalories
of male C57Bl6 mice on either Low Fat; High Fat; Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 or
High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diet. |
||||
Group / Week |
Low Fat |
High Fat |
Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
High Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
1 |
11.8 ± 2.1 |
16.5 ± 3.2c |
9.8 ± 3.0b |
12.6 ± 4.6 |
2 |
12.1 ± 1.3 |
14.4 ± 2.0 |
11.9 ± 1.5 |
14.2 ± 2.5 |
3 |
12.2 ± 1.3 |
13.2 ± 2.4 |
12.0 ± 0.7 |
13.5 ± 1.5 |
4 |
12.2 ± 1.3 |
14.1 ± 2.1 |
12.0 ± 0.9 |
12.7 ± 1.5 |
5 |
12.6 ± 1.5 |
14.2 ± 1.3c |
12.0 ± 1.3b |
12.5 ± 1.0 |
6 |
12.6 ± 1.6b |
15.1±1.9a,c,d |
12.0 ± 1.0b |
12.8 ± 1.0b |
7 |
12.3 ± 1.4b |
15.4±1.5a,c,d |
12.5 ± 0.8b |
12.6 ± 0.9b |
8 |
11.7 ± 1.8b |
15.3±2.0a,c,d |
12.4 ± 0.9b |
12.6 ± 1.1b |
9 |
11.9 ± 1.5b |
15.2±1.6a,c,d |
12.0 ± 0.9b |
12.7 ± 1.0b |
10 |
12.8 ± 1.9b |
16.4±1.3a,c,d |
12.3 ± 1.2b |
13.4 ± 1.0b |
11 |
13.2 ± 2.0 |
15.8 ± 2.5 |
12.2 ± 1.7 |
13.8 ± 2.3 |
12 |
12.3 ± 2.0 |
14.6 ± 1.6 |
12.0 ± 1.1 |
13.0 ± 1.4 |
a. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat; b. P<0.05 vs. High Fat; c. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4; d. P<0.05 vs. High Fat + 2% FM-VP4. Average weekly caloric intake is given in kilocalories. |
Table 4: Average weekly water intake in milliliters of
male C57Bl6 mice on either Low Fat; High Fat; Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 or
High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diet. |
||||
Group / Week |
Low
Fat |
High
Fat |
Low
Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
High
Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
1 |
5.4 ± 1.3 |
5.5 ± 1.2 |
4.8 ± 1.5 |
4.8 ± 1.9 |
2 |
6.2 ± 1.5 |
5.8 ± 1.8 |
5.6 ± 1.5 |
6.3 ± 1.4 |
3 |
6.5 ± 1.4 |
6.2 ± 1.3 |
7.4 ± 1.5 |
7.4 ± 1.7 |
4 |
5.9 ± 1.3 |
6.3 ± 1.5 |
7.1 ± 1.2 |
6.5 ± 1.1 |
5 |
6.6 ± 1.7 |
6.1 ± 1.2 |
7.0 ± 1.3 |
6.9 ± 1.2 |
6 |
5.2 ± 0.5 |
4.7 ± 0.6c |
5.9 ± 0.6b |
5.3 ± 0.4 |
7 |
4.5 ± 0.2 |
4.5 ± 0.4 |
4.5 ± 0.5 |
4.6 ± 0.2 |
8 |
5.0 ± 0.6 |
4.6 ± 0.3 |
5.0 ± 0.5 |
5.0 ± 0.3 |
9 |
5.1 ± 0.4 |
4.9 ± 0.8 |
4.7 ± 0.6 |
4.9 ± 0.9 |
12 |
4.5 ± 0.1 |
4.8 ± 0.5 |
4.5 ± 0.2 |
4.6 ± 0.4 |
a. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat; b. P<0.05 vs. High Fat;
c. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4; d. P<0.05 vs. High Fat + 2% FM-VP4.
Average weekly water intake is given in milliliters. Weeks 10 and 11 were not
determined. |
Water intake was measured on a daily basis for the first 34 days
while it was measured twice a week for the remainder of the experiment. The
weekly averaged data and statistical significance of comparison of each group
is given in
Table 4. Water intake of the groups did vary on a week to week
basis but the differences in water intake between the treatment groups were not
significant during the entire experiment. Water intake was not measured in weeks
10 and 11, but since there was no difference in the water intake between groups
for all the other weeks(weeks 1-9 and week 12) it might be assumed that the
water intake in these 2 weeks were not significantly different.
Plasma total cholesterol and
triglyceride levels
The
effects of FM-VP4 on plasma total cholesterol and triglyceride levels are shown
in
Figures 4 and
5 respectively. The animals of the
High Fat group displayed a
significant increase in
total plasma cholesterol of the
High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM- cholesterol as compared to the animals of the Low Fat
group as would be expected (p<0.05). The total VP4 group was significantly
lower compared to the High Fat group by 32.2% (p<0.05), while the total
plasma cholesterol concentration of the Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group was
significantly lower compared to the Low Fat group by 45.1% (p<0.05). These
results are in accordance with previously obtained results suggesting that
FM-VP4 decreases plasma cholesterol levels following chronic oral
administration (5,7,8).
Figure
4: Total plasma
cholesterol levels in mg/dl of male C57Bl6 mice on either Low Fat; High Fat;
Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 or High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diet. a. P<0.05 vs.
Low Fat; b. P<0.05 vs. High Fat; c. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4; d.
P<0.05 vs. High Fat + 2% FM-VP4.
The plasma triglyceride levels were not significantly different
between High Fat versus High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 treatment groups (Figure 5).
However, significant lowering of the triglyceride levels between the Low Fat +
2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group compared to the High Fat and the Low Fat groups
respectively (p<0.05) was observed.
Table 4: Average weekly water intake in milliliters of
male C57Bl6 mice on either Low Fat; High Fat; Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 or
High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 diet. |
||||
Group / Week |
Low
Fat |
High
Fat |
Low
Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
High
Fat + 2% FM-VP4 |
1 |
5.4 ± 1.3 |
5.5 ± 1.2 |
4.8 ± 1.5 |
4.8 ± 1.9 |
2 |
6.2 ± 1.5 |
5.8 ± 1.8 |
5.6 ± 1.5 |
6.3 ± 1.4 |
3 |
6.5 ± 1.4 |
6.2 ± 1.3 |
7.4 ± 1.5 |
7.4 ± 1.7 |
4 |
5.9 ± 1.3 |
6.3 ± 1.5 |
7.1 ± 1.2 |
6.5 ± 1.1 |
5 |
6.6 ± 1.7 |
6.1 ± 1.2 |
7.0 ± 1.3 |
6.9 ± 1.2 |
6 |
5.2 ± 0.5 |
4.7 ± 0.6c |
5.9 ± 0.6b |
5.3 ± 0.4 |
7 |
4.5 ± 0.2 |
4.5 ± 0.4 |
4.5 ± 0.5 |
4.6 ± 0.2 |
8 |
5.0 ± 0.6 |
4.6 ± 0.3 |
5.0 ± 0.5 |
5.0 ± 0.3 |
9 |
5.1 ± 0.4 |
4.9 ± 0.8 |
4.7 ± 0.6 |
4.9 ± 0.9 |
12 |
4.5 ± 0.1 |
4.8 ± 0.5 |
4.5 ± 0.2 |
4.6 ± 0.4 |
a. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat; b. P<0.05 vs. High Fat;
c. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat + 2% FM-VP4; d. P<0.05 vs. High Fat + 2% FM-VP4.
Average weekly water intake is given in milliliters. Weeks 10 and 11 were not
determined. |
Figure
5: Total plasma triglyceride levels in mg/dl of male C57Bl6 mice on either
Low Fat; High Fat; Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 or High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4
diet. a. P<0.05 vs. Low Fat; b. P<0.05 vs. High Fat.
Plasma creatinine and AST/ALT levels
No
significant differences in plasma creatinine, AST and ALT levels were observed
for all four groups in this study (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this experiment
was to elucidate if FM-VP4 reduced body weight gain in a dietary-induce obese
animal model. The 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 dose
chosen in this study was based on our previous findings reported in gerbils
(7,8) and ApoE deficient mice (5). In those studies we have reported that
FM-VP4 at 2% (w/w) significantly reduced body weight gain (gerbils only) (8)
and plasma lipid levels (gerbils and mice) (5,8) without any side effects. In
addition, FM-VP4 is well tolerated even at a high daily dose (100 mg/day)
without producing diarrhoea or other gastrointestinal intolerance signs (8).
Furthermore, since FM-VP4 comprises vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and phytostanyl
moieties, covalently linked by a phosphodiester bridge, it is possible that the
effects reported in these studies might be due to the ability of unesterified
stanols to inhibit cholesterol absorption, or the combined effect of free
ascorbate and unesterified stanols following cleavage of FM-VP4 into its
component parts by digestive lipases. Thus, we have compared the effects of
FM-VP4 with equivalent amounts of ascorbic acid or phytostanols given
individually or together in the diet in the ApoE deficient mouse study and
found minimal effects of these components of FM-VP4 (5). Therefore, only FM-VP4
was used in this study.
We observed that the largest effect could be seen between animals
of the High Fat group compared with animals of the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4
group, which suggests that FM-VP4 indeed has a weight gain reducing effect when
it is administered to animals that have a high percentage of fat in their diet.
In the 12 weeks this experiment lasted there is a reduction of weight gain of 51%
between the High Fat and the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 groups, while the
weight gain between the Low Fat and the Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group was reduced
by 17%. Interestingly the food and caloric intake of the animals in the High
Fat group were slightly higher than the animals of all other groups including
the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group, suggesting that FM-VP4 might have an
appetite suppressing effect since the caloric content of the two High Fat diets
are comparable (Table 1). This is
further supported by the observation that in all of the comparisons beyond week
five of the study there were reductions in food intake in the High Fat + 2%
(w/w) FM-VP4 group compared to the High Fat group. However, this finding was
not observed in the Low Fat control and FM-VP4 treatment groups suggesting that
FM-VP4 may only inhibit the gastrointestinal absorption of excessive fat.
Further studies to explain these findings are required.
There was also a significant decrease in total plasma
cholesterol levels and the weight of abdominal fat pads between the High Fat
and High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 groups (Figures 2 and 3). The observation that
the caloric intake was lower in the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 group compared
to the High Fat group could have impacted the difference in body weight gain
(Figure 2), weight of the abdominal fat pads (Figure 3) and plasma cholesterol
levels (Figure 4) in these animals. However, the finding that the High Fat + 2%
(w/w) FM-VP4 group also showed a significant decrease in the values of the
obesity parameters compared to the Low Fat group with an observed lower caloric
intake, shows that the difference in weight gain can be attributed to the
effect of FM-VP4.
The reduced weight gain in the FM-VP4 treatment groups did not
seem detrimental to the animals. All the animals were healthy and active and
showed no signs of any discomfort due to the treatment. The only group that
showed signs of less activity throughout the last 3 weeks of the experiment was
the High Fat group, possibly due to their high body weight. Interestingly the
animals of the Low Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4 and the High Fat + 2% (w/w) FM-VP4
groups had similar characteristics concerning weight gain, plasma cholesterol
and weight of the abdominal fat pads. This observation suggests that FM-VP4 may
inhibit the uptake of excessive amounts of cholesterol, but it does not hinder
the uptake of essential amounts of cholesterol needed by the body to function
properly. Future studies to investigate
this are warranted.
In conclusion, FM-VP4 displayed potential weight-loss and
cholesterol lowering properties in both High Fat and Low Fat Diets treated
groups. These results warrant further investigation in a dose response study to
see if FM-VP4 will show as potent anti-obesity effects in more clinically
relevant doses.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Funding for this project was
provided by a Collaborative Research Development Grant from the National
Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Forbes Medi-Tech Inc.
(#CRDPJ 305231-03 to KMW).
REFERENCES
1. Marx J. Cellular warriors at the battle of
the bulge. Science 299:846-849 (2003).
2. Fernandez-Lopez JA, Remesar X, Foz M, Alemany M. Pharmacological
approaches for the treatment of obesity. Drugs 62(6):915-944, (2002).
3. Katzmarzyk PT. The Canadian obesity epidemic, 1985-1998. CMAJ,
166(8);1039-1040 (2002)
4. Ng AW, Lukic T, Pritchard PH, Wasan KM. Development of novel
water-soluble phytostanol analogs:
disodium ascorbyl phytostanyl phosphates (FM-VP4): preclinical pharmacology,
pharmacokinetics and toxicology. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 21: 151-168 (2003).
5. Lukic T, Wasan KM, Zamfir D, Moghadasian MH, Pritchard PH.
Disodium ascorbyl phytostanyl phosphate
reduces plasma cholesterol concentrations and atherosclerotic lesion formation
in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Metabolism 52: 425-431 (2003).
6. Wasan KM, Zamfir C, Pritchard PH, Pederson RA. Influence of
phytostanol phosphoryl ascorbate
(FM-VP4) on insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, plasma lipid levels and gastrointestinal absorption of exogenous
cholesterol in Zucker (fa/fa) fatty and lean rats. J Pharm Sci 92: 281-288
(2003).
7. Wasan KM, Najafi S, Peteherych KD, Pritchard PH: Effects of a
novel hydrophilic phytostanol analog on plasma lipid concentrations in gerbils.
J Pharm Sci 90:1795-1799, (2001).
8. Wasan KM, Najafi S, Wong J, Kwong M, Pritchard PH: Assessing
plasma lipid levels, body weight and hepatic and renal toxicity following
chronic oral administration of a water soluble phytostanol compound, FM-VP4, to
gerbils. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci
4:228-234, (2001).
9. Wasan KM, Peteherych KD, Najafi S, Zamfir C, Pritchard PH:
Assessing the plasma pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, excretion and effects
on cholesterol pharmacokinetics of a
novel hydrophilic compound, FM-VP4, following administration to rats. J Pharm Pharmaceut
Sci 4:207-216, (2001).
10. Cullen P, G. Assmann. High-risk strategies for atherosclerosis.
Clin. Chim. Acta. 286(1-2):31-45 (1999).
11. Hendriks HFJ, J.A. Weststrate, T. van Vliet, G.W. Meijer. Spreads
enriched with three different levels
of vegetable oil sterols and the degree of cholesterol lowering in
normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects. Eur. J. Clin.
Nutr. 53:319-327 (1999).
12. Hallikainsen MA, M.I. Uusitupa. Effects of 2 low-fat stanol
ester-containing margarines on serum
choles-terol concentrations as part of a low-fat diet in
hyper-cholesterolemic subjects.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69:403-410 (1999).
13. Gylling, H, T.A. Miettinen. Cholesterol reduction by different
plant stanol mixtures and with
variable fat intake. Metabolism 48:575-580 (1999).
14. Jones PJH, F.Y. Ntanios, M. Raeini-Sarjaz,
15. Weststrate JA, G. W. Meijer. Plant sterol-enriched margarines and
reduction of plasma total- and LDL-cholesterol concentrations in
normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects. Eur. J. Clin.
Nutr. 52:334-343 (1998).
16. Jones PJ, T. Howell, D.E. MacDougall, et al. Short-term
administration of tall oil phytosterols improves plasma lipid profiles in
subjects with different cholesterol levels. Metabolism 47:751-756 (1998).
17. Gylling H, R. Radhakrishnan, T.A. Miettinen. Reduction of serum
choleserol in postmenopausal women with previous myocardial infarction and
cholesterol malabsorption induced by dietary sitostanol ester margarine: women
and dietary sitostanol. Circulation 96:4266-4231 (1997).
18. Gylling H, T.A. Miettinen. Effects of inhibiting cholesterol
absorption and synthesis on cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism in
hypercholesterollemic non-insulin dependent diabetic men. J. Lipid Res.
37:1776-1785 (1996).
19. Miettinen TA, P. Puska, H. Gylling, et al. Reduction of serum
cholesterol with sitostanol-ester margarine is a mildly hypercholesterolemic
population.
21.
Gylling H, M.A. Siimes, T.A. Miettinen.
Sitostanol ester margarine in dietary treatment of children with familial
hypercholesterolemia. J. Lipid Res. 36:1807-1812 (1995).
22.
Vanhanen HT, J. Kajander, H. Lehtovirta, T.A.
Miettinen. Serum levels, absorption efficacy, fecal elimination and synthesis
of cholesterol during increasing dosing of dietary sitostanol esters in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Clin. Sci.
87:61-67 (1994).
23.
Gylling H, T.A. Miettinen. Serum cholesterol
and cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism in hypercholesterolemic NIDDM
patients before and during sitostanol ester-margarine treatment. Diabetologia. 37:773-780 (1994).
24. Becker M, D. Staab, K. Von Bergmann. Treatment of severe familial
hypercholesterolemia in childhood with sitosterol and sitostanol. J. Pediatr.
122:292-296 (1993).
25. Hildebrandt AL,
Kelly-Sullivan DM, Black SC. Antiobesity effects of chronic cannabinoid CB1
receptor antagonist treatment in diet-induced obese mice. European Journal of
Pharmacology 462: 125-132 (2003).
26. Henry M, Ghibaudi L, Gao J, Hwa JJ.Energy metabolic profile of mice after chronic activation of central NPY Y1, Y2, or Y5 receptors. Obes Res. 2005 Jan;13(1):36-47.
Published by the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Copyright © 1998 by the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences.
CSPS Home | JPPS Home | Search | Subscribe to JPPS