# DWD

comments:
all bark gone cracking wood along length


comments:
hard, some broken branches, bark loose and falling off


# Plot_overstory

comments:
extra blank record deleted for this plot


comments:
the tag for these stems is a ?rectangular tag - numbers start back up at 1 - not to be confused with other stems in NRH tagged from 1-261


comments:
*check the 2008 data for stem 1076 dead or alive


comments:
corrected - had it entered as PSHsalvage


# Plot_shrub

comments:
started north and moved clockwise - 2 clumps PICO seedlings ~ 2.5 m NW adjacent to large overstory PICO


comments:
calipers not working - so less precision; two clumps start west and move counter clockwise


comments:
start in east, 3 clumps, digital caliper not working


comments:
1 clump at 70 degrees, other two dlumps just out of drip line


comments:
1 dead clump and 1 live clump (3 smaller patches)


comments:
calipers were messed up so 1.5 mm was subtracted from value ondatasheet - these are correct values


comments:
had to subtract values of 1.5 b/c of caliper - these are corrected values


comments:
remove 1.5 mm from all msmts today - these are the corrected values


comments:
these are corrected values with 1.5 mm subtracted from datasheet value


comments:
1F has alcr just at edge of 4-m radius drip line


comments:
1B just at 4 m mark is drip line of ALCR, start in north and worked clockwise


# Plot_type

Comments:
2 m length of transect measured for 0-.5, .5-1, 1-3;4-m length for 3-5, 5-7


ecosystem_component:
understory forbs, grasses and short shrubs


# Plot_understoryveg

comments:
this was the first plot that Emily and I did, only 7.75g of soil used for pH in 2009


comments:
seems low cover - revisit, 49 is 4D late


comments:
the probes were accidentlly put in 4B instead of 3B so no probes, GC for 4B was redone in 09 for 08 and was GC vial 108 for the redo

PLFAGCvial_08:
14 or 127 - illegible H or N C4B - at 4B not 3B

comments_PLFA:
* 2008 PLFA is actually at 4B so not directly useable


comments:
probes are in SE quadrant, rather than NE


comments_PRS_probe_09:
PLFA repeat - need to confirm on data sheet this correct


comments:
branches with needles of 40 added to the litter value


comments:
the litter cover was updated to 70 from 65 to include the needles and wood value of 70 from the litter value of 65


comments:
the PLFA analysis was redone in 2009 for 2008 samples and GC vial for this is 101


comments:
flagged probes in NW quadrants rrather than NE


comments:
probes not flagged, squirrel midden - too deep to dig to mineral in some spots


comments:
169 is the 4D late, litter value was updated from 60 to 85 because of the 'wood needles' that was originally included in the understory veg table and subsequently removed


comments:
base of shrubs is out, but the alder cover is in


comments:
rock cover is actually exposed mineral soil, 33 is 4D late for PRS probe


comments:
2 depths are missing so mean is only based on 2 depths, 2 BDs of 9.2 and 19.8


# Species

comments:
*can't seem to locate this name in the USDA Plants DB?!


comments:
this is mostly the unknown grass - confirmed by J Gould


comments:
Ided by R Caners as DIPO rather than ukmoss


comments:
this one is hairier with long hairs at the tips of each leaf


comments:
identified The Pojar book suggests just 1-few leaves in rosette at base - but otherwise this jives with the description and pictures - confirmed at herbarium


comments:
need to check the species - this is wrong I think based on USDA plant distribution


comments:
we had identified some samples in the field as RUCH - but visit to herbarium confirmed these as RUPE


comments:
this could have been confused in the field with STAM…


comments:
was updated from SPAL after a visit to the herbarium


comments:
?could also be fairy bells- disporum trachycarpum - need to confirm with herbarium as of May 09 - branched resembles smilacina


comments:
unknown purple clover species has been tentatively IDed as pratense


comments:
- likely mostly CAMO but have to leave it at grass level I think


comments:
was also VACAespitosum included with this.


# species_census

comments:
sample is on page 132 of my book to confirm ID,  Thought was pedatus at first but is distintly trifoliate rather than palmately cleft into 5 - different from RUPE


comments:
this is the purple clover - need to look it up


comments:
was a sample present to confirm as ELIN vs UKGR


comments:
based on herbarium sample was changed from RUCH to RUPE


comments:
assigned as one afterwards - hadn't been recorded


comments:
clover - dark green leaves puprple flowered


comments:
unknown page 187 appears to be the arnica in this stand


comments:
had question mark beside it without a rank - assuming a 1


comments:
note of it's presence made on 8/5/08 shrub datasheet


comments:
Ribes near 7B shrub plot and recorded there


comments:
mentioned that was seen in plot of NRH1001B DWD worksheet


comments:
no relative abundance provided, but was identified from herbarium sample as being found in PSH control


comments:
*make sure this is the correct arnica - should be based on ehrbarium ID as predominant AR being CO


comments:
DIDN'T COUNT BUT LOOKS TO BE PRESENT IN QUADRAT 4B?


comments:
reindeer lichen, arnica, spal all seen and made note in shrub datasheet of 7F


comments:
identified from comparison with herbarium - although didn't have the big leaves attached


# Stem

comments_2010:
decay class updated from 3 to 2 for 2008


comments_2010:
corrected previous to live in 2008 based on 2010 finding


comments_2010:
decay class previous corrected from 4 to 3


comments_2010:
updated to live in 2008 based on 2010 findings


comments:
yes this appears to be out of queue intentionally in terms of tag number


comments_2010:
live status corrected from dead before to live


comments_2010:
live status updated from dead to alive for 2008


comments_2010:
decay class updated to 3 from 4 for 2008


comments_2010:
decay class assumed to be 3 for fallen in 2010


comments_2010:
*cones was recorded as 2 in 2008 - delete


comments_2010:
snapped/untreated, decay class updated to 3 from 4 in 2008


comments_2010:
udpated species to PIMA was recorded as PICO


comments_2010:
updated live status to live based on 2010


comments:
*marked as abba rather than pico based on visit in 09


comments_2010:
decay class 2008 corrected

decay class 2008 corrected
cted


comments_2010:
one branch only - updated to live from dead in 2008


comments_2010:
updated decay class from 4 to 3 for 2008


comments_2010:
corrected from decay class 1 to healthy in 2008


comments_2010:
updated decay class from 5 to 4 for 2008


comments_2010:
corrected from dead to alive in 2008 based on 2010 findings


comments_2010:
converted live status to live from dead in 2008


comments_2010:
corrected decay class from 5 to 4 in 2008


comments_2010:
broken top but alive, updated from dead to alive in 2008


comments_2010:
cones from 2008 updated from no cones to none open based on 2010 findings


comments_2010:
was misrecorded as dead in 2008, corrected


comments_2010:
decay class updated to 4 from 5 for 2008


comments:
HT ADDED WHEN THIS TREE FELL DOWN IN 2009 AND WAS RECORDED


comments:
huge decaying burl with lean, exposed inner bole


comments:
broken off, one little branch, bark intact


comments_2010:
was not entered in 2008 - check datasheet


# Understoryveg

comments:
think it's CACA so updated from UKGR to CACA


comments:
was corrected from Ukmoss based on R Caners ID as DIPO


comments:
unknown grass was identified as CACA on 8/27/08


comments:
unknown grass identified from herbarium as CILA


comments:
updated from 20 based on revisiting datasheet -looks like decimal


comments:
I think it's 0.5 rather than 5 looking at datasheet so updated


comments:
this grass has wide leaves and so is more likely to be CACA …


comments:
unknown clover - note that herbarium Ided the Ukclover as TRHY - so may need to update this when revisit in 2009


comments:
updated from 1 to 7 based on datasheet july 2011


comments:
CORRECTED FOR POBA - SHADE LEAVES LOOK DIFFERENT ON YOUNGER


comments:
woodneedlesvalue of 70 was removed and that is why 815 ID is missing


comments:
woodneedles value of 25 was deleted, which is why record 969 is missing


comments:
identified from sample as CILA from unknown


comments:
updated from UKGR to ELIN based on sample


comments:
based on herbarium sample was changed from RUAC to RUPE


comments:
Thought was pedatus at first but is distinctly trifoliate rather than palmately cleft into 5 - different from RUPE


comments:
plsp is how it was recorded on the datasheet


