What
Is Quality?
Yonatan
Reshef
School of Business
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
Garvin, D.A. 1988. Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge.
Free Press.
Quality is a
multi-dimensional perspective-based concept:
-
performance
-
features
-
reliability
-
conformance
-
durability
-
serviceability
-
aesthetics
-
perceived quality
Deming, W.E. 1986. Out of The Crisis. MIT Press: 168-9:
Juran, J.M. 1989. Juran on Leadership for Quality. Free Press: 15-6.
Crosby, P.B. 1985. Quality Without Tears. Signet: 17:
OLD ASSUMPTIONS* |
NEW ASSUMPTIONS |
Quality is just one of many functional specialties |
Quality is a strong corporate competitive strategy
|
Quality is not seen as a competitive element as long as you match your
competitors |
Quality is a common corporate-wide language of problem identification and
problem solving |
Quality is a specialized function carried out by a small number of experts
reporting to their superiors |
A "market-in" orientation in which every effort is made to
internalize external customer preferences |
An emphasis on downstream (post-manufacturing) fixes |
All-employee involvement in quality improvements |
Quality improvement activities are limited repetitive cycles of detect and
repair |
An upstream prevention focus |
Quality is a stand-alone effort, with each functional specialty (e.g.,
design, manufacturing, marketing) acting to
maximize its own goals |
Anticipation of customer needs sometimes even before customers are aware
of them |
Quality evaluation is based on whether a product or service is built or
delivered according to agreed-upon standards |
Training
activities are tied to continuous quality improvement |
|
Integration of quality into the corporate-wide control system of goals,
plans, and actions |
|
Emphasis on cross-functional cooperation to achieve quality improvement
objectives |
|
|
QUALITY IS SECONDARY TO MAKING MONEY
|
QUALITY IS THE WAY WE DO BUSINESS
|
*Robert E. Cole. 1998. "Learning from the
Quality Movement: What did and didn't Happen and Why?" California
Management Review, 41: 43-73.
|